 |  |  |  |  |
Modifying an nVentiv Mach I for extreme subzero performance
| |||||||||
|
Modifying an nVentiv Mach I for extreme subzero performance
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
30th March 2006, 23:38
| #11 |
| Member  Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: mechelen(belgium)
Posts: 2,037
 |  Tnx didn't know this site exist. http://www.hardwareonline.be/forum/ nice one hehe thorgal, we've talked about his prom on pm (TN fora) greetz 
__________________ watercooling, chilled water,direct phase change, cascade, custom modding |
|  |
|
31st March 2006, 17:15
| #12 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: mechelen(belgium)
Posts: 2,037
| http://www.madshrimps.be/forums/show...opper+n eeded yes this was one of my first posts on the forums here, thans for the compliments koensa  great things happend between that and now 
__________________ watercooling, chilled water,direct phase change, cascade, custom modding |
|
| |
|
3rd April 2006, 15:52
| #13 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
 | the last page of the article has been updated with more information on the system test by Alex from www.overclex.com http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=4 27
__________________  |
|
| |
|
16th April 2006, 17:16
| #14 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: mechelen(belgium)
Posts: 2,037
| great first results from stock mach2GT are in, still going to test 1 more time so i am 100% sure. i had 3° warmer on the 200W heatload but mine is a little more then 200W so that is within the errormargin.
__________________ watercooling, chilled water,direct phase change, cascade, custom modding |
|
| |
|
18th April 2006, 15:50
| #15 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: mechelen(belgium)
Posts: 2,037
|  150W heatload and evap temp. compared to a stock mach2GT its ~22° colder  point 9 is 160W 
__________________ watercooling, chilled water,direct phase change, cascade, custom modding |
|
| |
|
18th April 2006, 16:01
| #16 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| I would not compare head to head with results from the ECT review as another sized fake heat load was used 
__________________ |
|
| |
|
18th April 2006, 16:45
| #17 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: mechelen(belgium)
Posts: 2,037
| its from petervandamned ohh i missed, its the other graph edited previous post
__________________ watercooling, chilled water,direct phase change, cascade, custom modding |
|
| |
|
18th April 2006, 17:19
| #18 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| even if you used the "other chart" it's still not good to immediately compare and draw conclusion from it; mounting pressure, thermal paste used, the size of the dummy load and other variables all play a role; and since you don't mention ambient/room temps; your value loses... its value Petervandamned's charts doesn't show ambient temp either; but for his test it was not needed as it was the difference between the different heat loads which is important not the temperature values by themselves. so like I said: make a chart with your Prommy's at different heat loads, and record ambient temp and store it in a back-upped excel sheet for future reference
__________________ |
|
| |
|
18th April 2006, 17:27
| #19 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: mechelen(belgium)
Posts: 2,037
| k
__________________ watercooling, chilled water,direct phase change, cascade, custom modding |
|
| |
|
30th April 2006, 20:12
| #20 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: mechelen(belgium)
Posts: 2,037
| http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=90497 prommy is running fine it seems alex is having a great time!
__________________ watercooling, chilled water,direct phase change, cascade, custom modding |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
