| Thread Tools |
7th March 2003, 07:27 | #11 |
Posts: n/a
| sorry, folks my mistake your wright, you need them in both systems. sometimes i dont look further than my nose is long. vrije vertaling |
7th March 2003, 10:22 | #12 |
Posts: n/a
| And you're on tweakers.net http://www.tweakers.net/nieuws/25840 |
7th March 2003, 10:37 | #13 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| pimping
__________________ |
7th March 2003, 19:10 | #14 |
Posts: n/a
| A typo ? Imo the 2200+ was the first cpu using a tbred-core (A-type), or am mistaking ? |
8th March 2003, 02:30 | #15 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| typo? where?
__________________ |
8th March 2003, 11:26 | #16 | |
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
| |
8th March 2003, 12:02 | #17 | |
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
Looking up ... /mod: HAAAA, pimped ! http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/2002...ghbred-01.html | |
8th March 2003, 12:57 | #18 | |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Quote:
anyway thanks for mentioning it, article has been "fixed"
__________________ | |
8th March 2003, 19:57 | #19 |
Posts: n/a
| You're welcome. :-) And besides, that article really w0x and I found it very useful lately. Good job thus. |
9th March 2003, 01:34 | #20 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| glad you found it usefull, makes me I got confused , when the XP2100+ was released it was really hard to get it unlocked (you had to use a dremel on the cpu :/) so it stood out against the XP2000+ in my mind as being different, but not tbred different is seems
__________________ |
Thread Tools | |
| |