 |  |  |  |  |
![[MADshrimp] Team Stats 12/01/2003](https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/iconimages/f5/madshrimp-team-stats-12-01-2003-a.gif)
[MADshrimp] Team Stats 12/01/2003
| |||||||||
|
[MADshrimp] Team Stats 12/01/2003
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
14th January 2003, 19:27
| #31 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 692
![[Bonbon] Freshly Registered](https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/images/reputation/reputation_balance.gif) |  added today : athlon 1400 - 512 Mb sdram (runs +- 5h/day) will add tomorrow : duron 950 - 256 Mb sdram (runs 12h/ day) will add in the weekend : duron 1000 - 256 Mb sdram (runs 8h/day) does 256Mb <-> 512 make a difference ?
__________________ intelD820 (2*2.8), 1gb ram , 6600gt , lots of hdd |
![[Bonbon] is offline](https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
|
|
14th January 2003, 19:28
| #32 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
 | not all , for Folding it is only the raw CPU power that counts, high FSB also doesn't matter
__________________  |
|
|
|
14th January 2003, 20:41
| #33 | |
|
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
| |
|
14th January 2003, 20:59
| #34 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| nope, more to memory bandwidth, the higher the FSB, the more memory bandwidth you'll have, and the more data can be send between the RAM & the CPU , thereby increasing the overall performance of the system, without changing the actual speed of the processor
__________________ |
|
|
|
14th January 2003, 21:46
| #35 | |
|
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
I'm sorry, but I really don't get that one. If you have a fixed multiplier, like the P4 has, and you up the fsb, then in my humble opinion, you DO change the actual speed of the processor. So, a higher fsb, will get you more cpu power, so faster folding. | |
|
14th January 2003, 21:47
| #36 |
|
Posts: n/a
| My point exactly! |
|
14th January 2003, 21:47
| #37 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| yes this is in case you have a locked multiplier I'm too used of working with amd 
__________________ |
|
|
|
14th January 2003, 21:53
| #38 |
|
Posts: n/a
| blame it on AMD, you are drunk again! Admit it!! (In case you are not, look at them dancing for 5 mins, and u will be)  PS: Focus on their eyes |
|
14th January 2003, 22:12
| #39 | |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Quote:
I dont drink and update stats @the same time 
__________________ | |
|
|
|
14th January 2003, 22:38
| #40 |
|
Posts: n/a
| ow yes, ur right, u only overclock when ur drunk... sorry, my mistake :grin: |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [MADshrimp] Team Stats 15-05-2004 (New Team!) | jmke | Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home | 36 | 20th May 2004 14:13 |
| [MADshrimp] Team Stats 17-05-2004 | jmke | Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home | 41 | 19th May 2004 12:59 |
| [MADshrimp] Team Stats 16-05-2004 | jmke | Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home | 3 | 16th May 2004 23:00 |
| [MADshrimp] Team Stats 22&23/02/2003 | jmke | Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home | 4 | 23rd February 2003 17:49 |
| [MADshrimp] Team Stats 04/02/2003 | jmke | Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home | 23 | 5th February 2003 21:17 |
| [MADshrimp] Team Stats 07/01/2003 | jmke | Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home | 30 | 8th January 2003 15:45 |
| [MADshrimp] Team Stats 17&18/12/2002 | jmke | Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home | 25 | 20th December 2002 16:02 |
| [MADshrimp] Team Stats 12/12/2002 | jmke | Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home | 10 | 15th December 2002 21:33 |
| [MADshrimp] Team Stats 09&10/12/2002 | jmke | Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home | 23 | 12th December 2002 21:16 |
| [MADshrimp] Team Stats 05/12/2002 | jmke | Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home | 4 | 7th December 2002 15:59 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
