AMD's 3GHz K10 to break 30,000 3DMark06 - Page 2

30th August 2007, 14:00

And they still didn't calculate it the way I wanted too.

gotta do it myself ><

GPU score of a stock crossfire 2900 setup: 12980

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2694745

GPU score of a crossfire 2900 setup near INQ clocks: 13080

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2664231

so we get

CPU score stock: 10787

CPU score overclocked: 16951

A 57% increase. Does boosting the CPU clock increase the GPU scores that much that my results are completely off?

jmke · 30th August 2007, 14:09

you compare C2D to C2Quad ?

30th August 2007, 14:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmke

you compare C2D to C2Quad ?

Doesn't seem to have an influence on the GPU scores, which is interesting for my comparison as the bigger the CPU effect is on the GPU scores, the less it's worth.

geoffrey · 30th August 2007, 14:35

My Croffire test on DFI RD600, C2D @ 3,23GHz -> 14579 3D Marks 2006 (http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID= 581)

My other 'unofficial' test on P5B Del, CPU @ 3850MHz -> 15644 3D Marks 2006 (http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=620731)

No VGA overclocking with both benchmarks.
No perfect compare, second run is more tweaked for high score, and boards are different too, but with ~ 600MHz higher clocked CPU I got around 1000 extra 3D Marks.

3D Mark 2006 does scale well when you overclock your CPU, though knowing that Conroe allready has a short pipeline I can hardly believe that there is so much more performance left.

30th August 2007, 14:09	#12
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,022	you compare C2D to C2Quad ? __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Massman & Petit break 3DMark06 world record with Geforce GTX 260 in SLI	jmke	WebNews	0	17th April 2009 15:59
3GHz Phenom II to launch at $275	jmke	WebNews	0	9th December 2008 11:28
AMD's K10: a "dead" product or not?	jmke	WebNews	0	13th May 2008 23:48
Belgian Overclockers prepare to break 3DMark06 World Record	jmke	WebNews	0	3rd April 2008 13:06
AMD's Phenom processors	jmke	WebNews	0	13th December 2007 14:05
Phenom 3GHz won’t hit 30K in 3Dmark06	jmke	WebNews	2	4th September 2007 05:12
ASUS EN8800 Series Scores 10,531 on 3DMark06	jmke	WebNews	0	13th November 2006 17:32
AMD's Spansion sets IPO offer range	Sidney	WebNews	1	5th November 2005 04:18
AMD's 3GHz Athlon 64-FX 'due Q1 2006'	jmke	WebNews	1	26th July 2005 09:22
AMD's Chip Off The Old Block	Sidney	WebNews	0	29th July 2004 05:26

30th August 2007, 14:00	#11
Rutar Posts: n/a	And they still didn't calculate it the way I wanted too. gotta do it myself >< GPU score of a stock crossfire 2900 setup: 12980 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2694745 GPU score of a crossfire 2900 setup near INQ clocks: 13080 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2664231 so we get CPU score stock: 10787 CPU score overclocked: 16951 A 57% increase. Does boosting the CPU clock increase the GPU scores that much that my results are completely off?

30th August 2007, 14:35	#14
geoffrey [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 4,127	My Croffire test on DFI RD600, C2D @ 3,23GHz -> 14579 3D Marks 2006 (http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID= 581) My other 'unofficial' test on P5B Del, CPU @ 3850MHz -> 15644 3D Marks 2006 (http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=620731) No VGA overclocking with both benchmarks. No perfect compare, second run is more tweaked for high score, and boards are different too, but with ~ 600MHz higher clocked CPU I got around 1000 extra 3D Marks. 3D Mark 2006 does scale well when you overclock your CPU, though knowing that Conroe allready has a short pipeline I can hardly believe that there is so much more performance left.