It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Hardware Madness > Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding
Sometymes less is more... Sometymes less is more...
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Sometymes less is more...
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 14th August 2005, 19:18   #11
Member
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

Temp & sound measurements are keys, but at the very least it certainly looks clean and sexy
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline  
Old 14th August 2005, 19:46   #12
tnvtnv
 
Posts: n/a
Default temps and db

My digital soundmeter (radioshack) shows 23 db (c weighted) 3' from the front, 21.5 from the side.
Room temp. is 76.4f/case temp. is 83f/cpu temp (running Prime 98 for 20 minutes) is 105f.
Measurments on MBM5. tnv
 
Old 15th August 2005, 00:12   #13
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

c weighted does not reflect humar hearing; do you have a weighting also?
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 15th August 2005, 01:26   #14
tnvtnv
 
Posts: n/a
Default c vrs. a

It has both, but the instructions included with the unit said to use "c" and so that's what I did. Sorry, I'll cheque and post the "a" weighted reading shortly. tnv
 
Old 15th August 2005, 02:07   #15
tnvtnv
 
Posts: n/a
Default a vrs. c revisited

I called a friend who is a sound eng. and asked him why the "c weighted" measurment was recommended by Radioshack if it wasn't within human usable range. He explained it as follows:
The A, B and C weightings mainly differ in the degree of sensitivity at lower frequencies, relative to 1000Hz. The least sensitivity to lower frequencies is provided by the A-scale, the most by the C-scale. The D-scale gives an indication of perceived noisiness and is used in aircraft noise measurements.
So, as I understand him, using the "c weighted" was correct, since I was measuring a wider freq. then the "a wighted" and I can hear well below 1000hz. If anythng, the "c weighted" reading would actually have a higher db reading then the "a weighted" reading tnv
 
Old 15th August 2005, 11:44   #16
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Since A weighting is thought to provide the most accurate model of how the human ear perceives loudness, and noise that causes hearing damage correlates most closely to the A curve, the A network is usually specified in federal government regulations established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)


http://www.termpro.com/articles/hearing.html
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 15th August 2005, 22:11   #17
tnvtnv
 
Posts: n/a
Default thank you

Thanks for all the info. The next tyme the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) visits my house to cheque for hearing damage caused by my computer...I will make sure they're using the "a weighted" scale on their meters. However...unless the neighbors complain...I don't think I will be visited by them in the near future. I'll visit this forum sometyme again in the future. tnkx...tnv
 
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO