 |  |  |  |  |
Raystorm benchmarks
| |||||||||
|
Raystorm benchmarks
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
13th August 2002, 22:18
| #11 | |
| [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,344
 |  Quote:
Shadows + reflections | |
|
|
14th August 2002, 10:11
| #12 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| JMke, I don't see 1024*576 anywhere :-) 1024*768 gives me a score of 4057 @3.060 mhz....fekkin amd lover test 
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
14th August 2002, 10:26
| #13 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
 | weird... my score in resultbrowser displays ->
__________________  |
|
|
|
14th August 2002, 10:32
| #14 |
| [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,344
| I did the test once more: 3934 Marks. Test is based on pure mathematical powah => AMD's FPU kicks your shiney Intel butt! LOL, it's funny actually: Intel procs are good, except for calculations... what's else is it supposed to do?  |
|
|
|
14th August 2002, 11:22
| #15 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| play games @ double speed of AMD system 
__________________ |
|
|
|
14th August 2002, 12:13
| #16 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| rofl @JMke.
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
14th August 2002, 13:15
| #17 |
| [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,344
| hmm /me is going to shup up now.
__________________ HTPC (mac osx): Mac Mini | Core Duo 1.6Ghz | 2GB DDR2 | 26\" TFT Development (mac osx): Macbook | Core 2 2.0Ghz | 4GB DDR2 | 250GB HD Games (win xp): E2160 @ 2.4Ghz | HD3850 OC | Asrock 4coredual-vsta | 2GB DDR2 |
|
|
|
15th August 2002, 22:07
| #18 |
|
Posts: n/a
| This benchmark is pure CPU power right? No video involvement yes? I'll try it out, I wonder what my Tbird 1.333 can do  |
|
15th August 2002, 22:21
| #19 |
|
Posts: n/a
| Ok, it seems that I get 2605 Raymarks after running 640x480 mode with only shadows and reflections enabled. This is on an Athlon 1.331GHz running at 166MHz FSB. I wonder if my memory bandwidth helped at all? |
|
15th August 2002, 22:46
| #20 |
|
Posts: n/a
| 1349, 640*480, default details notice the eastereggs: -nature suxx and nature still suxx at loading screen -nature suxx at bus stop, at the rear federation against nature what's up with the nature test??? |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No Official Fermi Benchmarks Numbers To Be Expect At Cebit | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 2nd March 2010 13:40 |
| More NVIDIA GF100 Benchmarks: Far Cry 2 & Dark Void | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th January 2010 10:28 |
| NVIDIA "Fermi" Benchmarks Leaked? GeForce GTX 360 and 380 Performance Numbers [fake] | jmke | WebNews | 9 | 14th December 2009 21:30 |
| First AMD Benchmarks With DDR3 Memory Spotted | jmke | WebNews | 4 | 25th January 2009 16:39 |
| Quick and Dirty Quad-Core "Penryn" Benchmarks | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 24th August 2007 10:05 |
| NVIDIA & ATI GTK Benchmarks | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 31st July 2007 01:23 |
| AMD Launches AM2 - Benchmarks Numbers from all over the web | jmke | WebNews | 12 | 23rd May 2006 21:57 |
| Futuremark’s Benchmarks to Take Advantage of Physics Processor | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 12th October 2005 17:18 |
| ATI Response to Doom 3 Benchmarks | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th July 2004 08:13 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
