Official 3DMark03 Thread - Page 5

jmke · 12th February 2003, 16:56

Quote:

Wat ik wel vervelend vind, is dat dx9 compatibele kaarten per definiete een veel hogere score halen dan een dx8 kaartje, zelfs als het pakken trager is

SAME exact thing happened with 3Dmark & DX8.1 compliant vidcards (GF3) that scores alot higher then GF2Ultra, although they were not much faster...

The Senile Doctor · 12th February 2003, 17:00

tja

I agree with JMke, it's not going to be what we need...
Hardocp's ut2k3 benchmarker roxx

ahum
What is very good about the 3DMark03 is that it is not really CPU-dependent at the moment. We tried to run the software on Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz and AMD Athlon XP 3000+ powered computers based on E7205 and NVIDIA nForce2 chipsets with ATI RADEON 9700 PRO graphics cards. Apparently, the results were almost equal. The Intel-based PC received 4812 marks, while the AMD powered computer hit 4752 marks. Moreover, Ilia tried processors with different core-clock speeds and got very close results what means that currently the benchmark is more dependant on the performance of the graphics card, rather than on the speed of CPU.

tot binnen een maand of zes, 3dmark, for now you're not on my pjoeter

13th February 2003, 03:28

Benchmark is echt wel gemaakt om DX9 kaarten te testen
CPU snelheid en memory helpt
maar het echte vershil blijkt zich pas te meten eenmaal de graka
eraan te pas komt

DX9 kaarten halen veel meer punten
en t vershil in oc op een DX9 kaart heeft meer belang dan cpu OC.

zoals Jmke zegt
wat hebben we aan deze benchmark

14th February 2003, 02:40

dit lijkt gewoon een benchmark om reclame te maken voor ATI.
Ik vind het nie echt geslaagd.

18th February 2003, 22:34

wow

tried the XFX Ti 4200 64 Mb I borrowed from falco (for modding purposes, pics later) and I got 1420 marks (or was it 1240)

funny how my cheap XP machine (KR7A, proc @ 10*185, twimoss ram) keeps up in this test with my $$$ P4 sytem

I'll do 2morrow afternoon some more tests

Gamer · 19th February 2003, 00:06

got same results with XP 3000+ and a 3Ghz PIV....

this benchmark sucks monkey.....

start; programma's; futuremark; 3Dmark03; uninstall 3Dmark03 !!!

DUR0N · 15th March 2003, 08:50

Quote:

Originally posted by Gamer
got same results with XP 3000+ and a 3Ghz PIV....

isn't that somewhere the whole meaning of AMD's rating system?

The Senile Doctor · 15th March 2003, 09:02

yes it is.

gamer's lost directions

jmke · 15th March 2003, 13:12

he's not that young anymore people, have patience with an old man. Overclocking is something fast and furious. It takes longer for the "aged" among us

Gamer · 15th March 2003, 19:00

:spank:

he, I'm not that old

Rating is based on the athlon thunderbird, not with PIV <==> XP.

if you look at the XP 3000+ barton compared to the PIV 3.06 you will see a big difference....

Statement AMD bij introductie PR :
"Performance rating is gerelateerd aan de T-Bird, niet aan de P4"

12th February 2003, 17:00	#42
The Senile Doctor Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is Posts: 3,171	tja I agree with JMke, it's not going to be what we need... Hardocp's ut2k3 benchmarker roxx ahum What is very good about the 3DMark03 is that it is not really CPU-dependent at the moment. We tried to run the software on Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz and AMD Athlon XP 3000+ powered computers based on E7205 and NVIDIA nForce2 chipsets with ATI RADEON 9700 PRO graphics cards. Apparently, the results were almost equal. The Intel-based PC received 4812 marks, while the AMD powered computer hit 4752 marks. Moreover, Ilia tried processors with different core-clock speeds and got very close results what means that currently the benchmark is more dependant on the performance of the graphics card, rather than on the speed of CPU. tot binnen een maand of zes, 3dmark, for now you're not on my pjoeter __________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world

19th February 2003, 00:06	#46
Gamer [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 4,587	got same results with XP 3000+ and a 3Ghz PIV.... this benchmark sucks monkey..... start; programma's; futuremark; 3Dmark03; uninstall 3Dmark03 !!! __________________

15th March 2003, 09:02	#48
The Senile Doctor Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is Posts: 3,171	yes it is. gamer's lost directions __________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world

15th March 2003, 13:12	#49
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,022	he's not that young anymore people, have patience with an old man. Overclocking is something fast and furious. It takes longer for the "aged" among us __________________

15th March 2003, 19:00	#50
Gamer [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 4,587	:spank: he, I'm not that old Rating is based on the athlon thunderbird, not with PIV <==> XP. if you look at the XP 3000+ barton compared to the PIV 3.06 you will see a big difference.... Statement AMD bij introductie PR : "Performance rating is gerelateerd aan de T-Bird, niet aan de P4" __________________

13th February 2003, 03:28	#43
T-power Posts: n/a	Benchmark is echt wel gemaakt om DX9 kaarten te testen CPU snelheid en memory helpt maar het echte vershil blijkt zich pas te meten eenmaal de graka eraan te pas komt DX9 kaarten halen veel meer punten en t vershil in oc op een DX9 kaart heeft meer belang dan cpu OC. zoals Jmke zegt wat hebben we aan deze benchmark

14th February 2003, 02:40	#44
Syco Posts: n/a	dit lijkt gewoon een benchmark om reclame te maken voor ATI. Ik vind het nie echt geslaagd.

18th February 2003, 22:34	#45
TeuS Posts: n/a	wow tried the XFX Ti 4200 64 Mb I borrowed from falco (for modding purposes, pics later) and I got 1420 marks (or was it 1240) funny how my cheap XP machine (KR7A, proc @ 10*185, twimoss ram) keeps up in this test with my $$$ P4 sytem I'll do 2morrow afternoon some more tests

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
3DMark03 and HD 4870 X2 Performance Scaling Investigated	jmke	WebNews	0	12th September 2008 12:41
MSI Assigned New Official Distributor for Belgium: D&D Distribution	jmke	WebNews	0	2nd September 2008 10:09
Complete Official AMD Phenom motherboard support list,	jmke	WebNews	0	16th March 2008 13:55
Official Vista "performance" and "compatibility" packs released	jmke	WebNews	1	8th August 2007 11:06
INFO: Unofficial Opteron 939 information thread (DFI-Street)	jmke	FAQ / INFO / HOW-TO	1	17th January 2006 17:40
Corsair Memory Announced as Official Memory of ACON5	jmke	WebNews	0	18th March 2005 00:11
Futuremark Announces - Patch 3.5.0 for 3DMark03	jmke	WebNews	0	16th November 2004 15:27