 |  |  |  |  |
Official 3DMark03 Thread
| |||||||||
|
Official 3DMark03 Thread
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
12th February 2003, 12:48
| #31 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
 |  amd owns the lot... bad friggin benchmark anywayz  3.9 ghz p4 with radeon 9700, dunno clocks http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=13379 3.17ghz wtf??? 800 mhz difference in processor... radeon @417/344 difference in score...300 points... unless the clocks on the radeon number one are really low... this is one weird scoreing benchie...
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
12th February 2003, 12:59
| #32 |
| [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,344
| Yup, the cpu power seems to be very important. I've got 5132 3Dmarks with an XP@2100mhz and r9700 @ 330/310 i think. edit: calantak: your score is good for an 11th place at the orb. 
__________________ HTPC (mac osx): Mac Mini | Core Duo 1.6Ghz | 2GB DDR2 | 26\" TFT Development (mac osx): Macbook | Core 2 2.0Ghz | 4GB DDR2 | 250GB HD Games (win xp): E2160 @ 2.4Ghz | HD3850 OC | Asrock 4coredual-vsta | 2GB DDR2 |
|
|
|
12th February 2003, 13:00
| #33 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| I didn't have 5000 with a radeon @ 371/330 and 3.0 ghz p4... even the 4 ghz p4's hardly go over 6000... in games the difference wbetween 3 and 4 ghz (unreal tourney for example) will be big, at least 25%
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
12th February 2003, 13:02
| #34 | |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
 | Quote:
__________________  | |
|
|
|
12th February 2003, 15:24
| #35 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| this is not my score!!!! it's a score I've copied from xtremesys
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
12th February 2003, 15:28
| #36 |
| [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,344
| Oh I see.  I've tried twice to have a nice score, but 3DMark03 hung both times in nature at +- the same moment. Annoying, since you can't run nature first too see whether it's stable. Running 3Dmark takes too long now in my humble opinion. 
__________________ HTPC (mac osx): Mac Mini | Core Duo 1.6Ghz | 2GB DDR2 | 26\" TFT Development (mac osx): Macbook | Core 2 2.0Ghz | 4GB DDR2 | 250GB HD Games (win xp): E2160 @ 2.4Ghz | HD3850 OC | Asrock 4coredual-vsta | 2GB DDR2 |
|
|
|
12th February 2003, 15:41
| #37 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| ... topscore : oppainter CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 2807 MHz GPU: ATI RADEON 9700/9500 Series 492.0 MHz / 355.0 MHz (bijna 500 mhz op de radeon core...) 6500 (er staat nu al een fake op...) en opinie??? scoring system sucks... de vorige was duidelijk en realistisch en vooral SCALEABLE THIS one isn't!! CPU: Intel Pentium 4 3213 MHz GPU: ATI RADEON 9700/9500 Series 450.0 MHz / 405.0 MHz giving : 6377 poi,ts CPU: Intel Pentium 4 3875 MHz GPU: ATI RADEON 9700/9500 Series 451.0 MHz / 351.0 MHz giving 6196 points... 650 mhz cpu = 50 mhz gpu mem???? how the **** is this gonna add up?
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
12th February 2003, 15:53
| #38 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| it adds up that I, as stated before, will not use in reviews of vidcards 
__________________ |
|
|
|
12th February 2003, 16:27
| #39 | |
| [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,344
| Quote:
Wat ik wel vervelend vind, is dat dx9 compatibele kaarten per definiete een veel hogere score halen dan een dx8 kaartje, zelfs als het pakken trager is. Een R9500 64mb zal een véél hogere score krijgen dan bv een Ti4600, terwijl de laatste toch pakken sneller is. Het zou beter zijn moest er 2 scores worden gegeven: snelheid & kwaliteit, met kwaliteit afhankelijk van welke technieken het kan toepassen en welke AA / AF methode aan staat.
__________________ HTPC (mac osx): Mac Mini | Core Duo 1.6Ghz | 2GB DDR2 | 26\" TFT Development (mac osx): Macbook | Core 2 2.0Ghz | 4GB DDR2 | 250GB HD Games (win xp): E2160 @ 2.4Ghz | HD3850 OC | Asrock 4coredual-vsta | 2GB DDR2 | |
|
|
|
12th February 2003, 16:56
| #40 |
|
Posts: n/a
| idd scores zijn heel raar kheb op mijn pc met een P4 2.53 + 256mb ram + gf4 ti 4200 128mb een zeer lage score van 1000points uke: en vriend van me heeft met een p4 1.6 + 256mb ram + radeon 9000 ongeveer evenveel punten ik had met 3dmark 2k1 1200points en hij maar 6000 heel raar vind ik zo  |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3DMark03 and HD 4870 X2 Performance Scaling Investigated | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 12th September 2008 12:41 |
| MSI Assigned New Official Distributor for Belgium: D&D Distribution | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 2nd September 2008 10:09 |
| Complete Official AMD Phenom motherboard support list, | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 16th March 2008 13:55 |
| Official Vista "performance" and "compatibility" packs released | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 8th August 2007 11:06 |
| INFO: Unofficial Opteron 939 information thread (DFI-Street) | jmke | FAQ / INFO / HOW-TO | 1 | 17th January 2006 17:40 |
| Corsair Memory Announced as Official Memory of ACON5 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th March 2005 00:11 |
| Futuremark Announces - Patch 3.5.0 for 3DMark03 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 16th November 2004 15:27 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
