| Thread Tools |
24th December 2009, 13:24 | #11 | |
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
Yes it did increase V-Core. I think I'm gonna wait till I have my new CPU cooler to have another go at experimenting. especially considering the technical mumbo-jumbo Massman threw in my general direction. That was almost scary dude. I think I'm gonna do a bit of reading on those technical aspects, just to really know what exactly I'm doing here... | |
24th December 2009, 13:47 | #12 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,209
| yep I would run everything stock till you get a good CPU cooler, then start lookign for a bit more ooomph. But i would strongly suggest to stay way from them AUTO settings. Eg my Rampage Gene II would set 2volts for my low voltage rams. If I didn't check it I would have smoked them for sure... And yes Massman is scary I second that, far too much technical info in that little head...
__________________ |
24th December 2009, 21:22 | #13 |
Posts: n/a
| Hm, I thought the uncore voltage could not be adjusted, but going by what you are saying if I adjust the "QPI voltage" (what Gigabyte unfortunately labels it) I am in fact changing the VTT voltage/uncore voltage? Or does changing the VTT not affect the uncore voltage as I had thought? So Intel does mention a 1.65v limitation in the data sheets for LGA1156? Then to pose a question, what about the PCIe controllers, those would still be running at 1.5v, which is 0.4v higher than the VTT on the same die. Why would VTT/RAM voltage be an issue but PCIe wouldn't? IMC's just that sensitive? Anandtech mentioned something about amplitude, but was as much as I remember... |
24th December 2009, 21:42 | #14 | ||
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| Quote:
I've experienced this problem, by the way, when I was testing the MSI P55-GD80: Quote:
| ||
Thread Tools | |
| |