It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Hardware Madness > Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding
A-Data Vitesta DDR566 A-Data Vitesta DDR566
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


A-Data Vitesta DDR566
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 17th November 2004, 16:14   #11
Member
 
easypanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,823
easypanic Freshly Registered
Default

absolutely not (yet?) stable:

__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\||____
|....The BEER TRUCK.... ||||'""|""°\_,__
|___Just for You___l||__|__|___|) _____|
|(@)(@)""""""""""""**|(@)(@)****|(@)|
easypanic is offline  
Old 17th November 2004, 17:28   #12
Member
 
The Senile Doctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
The Senile Doctor Freshly Registered
Default

what board do you have, easypanic?
and what cpu?
__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world
The Senile Doctor is offline  
Old 17th November 2004, 17:29   #13
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

DFI NF3 250Gb of course, what a question
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 17th November 2004, 17:33   #14
Member
 
easypanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,823
easypanic Freshly Registered
Default

lookie lookie

don't begin about the Vddr, at xtremesys there is a thread about a batch of TCCD that doesn't like volts. This one loves it hihi.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\||____
|....The BEER TRUCK.... ||||'""|""°\_,__
|___Just for You___l||__|__|___|) _____|
|(@)(@)""""""""""""**|(@)(@)****|(@)|
easypanic is offline  
Old 17th November 2004, 19:12   #15
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

DDR680

awesome! latest TCCD chips should indeed perform better starting above 3.1v. It should give you also higher speed with CL2 2-2-5 timings
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 17th November 2004, 19:38   #16
Member
 
easypanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,823
easypanic Freshly Registered
Default

Yup, but 3.3 - 3.5 v isn't much difference .

Oh well, good results till now .
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\||____
|....The BEER TRUCK.... ||||'""|""°\_,__
|___Just for You___l||__|__|___|) _____|
|(@)(@)""""""""""""**|(@)(@)****|(@)|
easypanic is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MS Says All Sidekick Data Recovered, But Damage Done jmke WebNews 0 15th October 2009 21:47
Nvidia’s Latest Core-Logic Causes Data Corruption During Overclocking jmke WebNews 4 19th April 2008 12:25
Data Transfer Rate between the Cores in Dual-Core Processors jmke WebNews 0 1st June 2006 11:00
IBM unveils software for real-time data backup Sidney WebNews 1 26th August 2005 17:22
Data Backup Part II: Several backup methods jmke WebNews 0 19th July 2005 09:27
Admin's RAID Data Recovery Guide Sidney WebNews 1 14th April 2005 09:32
Handy Recovery 2.0 Undeletion and Data Recovery Software jmke WebNews 0 24th February 2005 12:18
LaCie Data Bank: Portable External Hard Disk jmke WebNews 0 13th September 2004 15:58
IBM Storage Virtualization Software to Manage Massive Amounts of Data Sidney WebNews 0 26th May 2004 01:36

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:27.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO