| Thread Tools |
26th August 2009, 20:50 | #1 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| Ready for Lynnfield? 4x2GB from Corsair (CMD8GX3M4A1600C8) Last edited by Massman : 26th August 2009 at 20:53. |
26th August 2009, 20:54 | #2 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,209
| Kinky sticks I really wonder why they are specially Lynfield tagged...
__________________ |
26th August 2009, 21:01 | #3 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| One of the more good-looking memory kits I've seen |
26th August 2009, 22:07 | #4 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
| rev. 3.1 means they're micron based. Don't expect too much OC headroom, triple channel 3.1 rev's were not very good. |
26th August 2009, 22:33 | #5 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| Micron F to be precise |
26th August 2009, 23:19 | #6 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| we all know by now that raw bandwidth is not what Core i7 is waiting for, so anything even remotely "ok" rated will be plentiful for i5. This kit is all about size; you can run several VMs in your OS and still have plenty of free memory; you can go decadent and put the VM image onto a ramdisk to boost performance of the VM OS to a higher level than the host OS
__________________ |
4th September 2009, 08:38 | #7 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| Just put this kit in for a quick test; Needed 1.74V (maybe less, just increased 0.1V - doesn't boot at 1.65V) |
4th September 2009, 09:24 | #8 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
| Naais It's Micron so this doesn't surprise me |
4th September 2009, 09:25 | #9 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| Well, it's not that stable or performant. I switched back to 1600CL8 and am hitting higher bandwidth figures. |
4th September 2009, 10:10 | #10 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
| Have you tried with only 2 modules ? |
Thread Tools | |
| |