| Thread Tools |
31st May 2004, 17:25 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Danger Den TDX Water Block Preview We take an in-depth look at the latest water block from Danger Den; the TDX features the same performance increasing nozzles as the RBX but improves on its design. Tested on an Athlon 64 setup we take a look at what it can do! http://www.madshrimps.be/gotoartik.php?articID=188
__________________ |
31st May 2004, 17:48 | #2 |
Posts: n/a
| You should have tested the silver version at 126$ |
31st May 2004, 18:04 | #3 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| afaik only 2 websites have received this WB for review, Overclockers.com being one of them
__________________ |
1st June 2004, 16:10 | #4 |
Posts: n/a
| erm, The silver block is NOT sterling silver (92.5%), it is very pure 99.995% silver. Considerably more expensive and also quite a bit higher thermal conductivity than sterling silver. Stirling silver is probably no better than copper, if not worse given the high concentration of impurities. Stirling is for jewellery. Anything requiring thermal properties should stay well clear of stirling silver (take note aquacomputer and you REALLY shouldn't be charging more for a sterling block than DD does for the near pure silver TDX) [/rant] 8-ball |
2nd June 2004, 17:21 | #5 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| thank you for the correction 8-ball , the review has been updated.
__________________ |
2nd June 2004, 19:45 | #6 |
Posts: n/a
| OK, now everything makes sence ^^ |
3rd June 2004, 00:16 | #7 |
Posts: n/a
| Couldn't you update it again, and remove the line saying, that it's good to have the water stagnate in the waterblock? It's not good! It reduces the effeciendy of the waterblock, if the water stays in the block. |
3rd June 2004, 00:22 | #8 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| hello Unregistered, I've made some corrections in the article, any updates will be done in this color; thank you for your comments.
__________________ |
3rd June 2004, 08:39 | #9 |
Posts: n/a
| You haven't corrected the 925 sterling silver in the first paragraph... And indeed, stagnating water is bad... Just say that turbulences increase heat absorbtion by the water from the copper... PS: first time I read article, as I had no time before Oh, and you should know the TDX is less restrictive as the RBX, which makes another good point for buying it... Don't you have a Cascade to compare to? Would be nice to know how they are up to that old design of cathar... (which might be a bit too restrictive in my watercooling setup which needs to be finished: Tygon always escapes my grasp ) |
3rd June 2004, 10:33 | #10 | |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Quote:
I'm not the Author remember. Liquid3d is planning on doing a follow-up which includes comparisons to the German WBblock and the RBX; that's why this is a "pre"-view
__________________ | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Danger Den DD-GTX470 GPU Water Block | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 30th June 2010 15:26 |
Danger Den Summit GPU Water Block | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 10th April 2010 14:45 |
Danger Den Lists Water Block for Dual GPU Radeon Video Card | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 23rd October 2009 13:13 |
Danger Den 295 GTX Water Block | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 25th May 2009 09:59 |
Danger Den DD-29XT VGA Water Block | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 1st December 2007 15:44 |
Danger Den Releases New R600 Full Size Water Block | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 15th May 2007 09:17 |
Danger Den TDX Block, MAG Pump, DD MAG II & Maze 4 GPU Block | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 3rd August 2006 12:32 |
Danger Den NV-68 GPU Water Block Review | jmke | Articles & Howto's | 1 | 8th June 2005 13:49 |
Danger Den Chrome Version MAZE4 GPU Water Block | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 18th May 2005 16:17 |
Danger Den MAZE4 GPU Water Block | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 29th January 2005 21:00 |
Thread Tools | |
| |