 |  |  |  |  |
Corsair TwinX 4000 vs OCZ Gold 4000
| |||||||||
|
Corsair TwinX 4000 vs OCZ Gold 4000
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
27th September 2003, 02:17
| #1 | |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
 |  Corsair TwinX 4000 vs OCZ Gold 4000 Liquid3D shares his experiences with OCZ and Corsair's PC4000 memory modules  Quote:
__________________  | |
|  |
|
24th December 2003, 21:12
| #2 |
|
Posts: n/a
| hmm nice review but I think it would have been nicer had you included a test with the OCZ memory at 2.5 CAS. Isnt' that what the Gold edition supports? Some site have got that memory down to 2.0 CAS (Not at 250mhz, however). Bottom line; we all know that memory timings can significantly affect the performance and thus should be tested as well. |
| |
|
25th December 2003, 07:22
| #3 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
 | the matter of realworld performance with faster timings has NOT been clarified in my humble opinion... I still do NOT believe lowering timings does not speed up the pc, just look at what richbastard got fast timings AND 5:4 divider at fast timings are both faster then slow timings at 1:1 this needs to be clarified once and for all... we all need to know in an extensive way with multiple tests
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
| |
|
25th December 2003, 10:49
| #4 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| the problem is that there are not enough ramchips out there that can do CL2 2-2-5, even at 200Mhz 
__________________ |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
