 |  |  |  |  |
AMD nForce2 memory timings explored
| |||||||||
|
AMD nForce2 memory timings explored
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
3rd January 2004, 17:27
| #1 | |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
 |  AMD nForce2 memory timings explored Piotke clears the confusion that might be there with memory timings on your nForce2 setup  Quote:
__________________  | |
|  |
|
3rd January 2004, 18:55
| #2 |
|
Posts: n/a
| Now u got the hardware, might it be possible to test those 2-2-5 / 2-2-11 on your p4 system. I wonder what the difference is compared to my 2.5-3-3-7 settings this is the best my apacer pc3200 can handle. It's almost impossible to get 50b chips in standard belgian shops. Went to tones/forcom/digita/pcpartner and comtechnology but they only sell 50D |
| |
|
3rd January 2004, 19:03
| #3 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
 | piotke will be getting a p4 cpu soon, so we'll get a follow up on that soon enough...
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
| |
|
3rd January 2004, 19:03
| #4 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| the 2-2-11 will only perform better on a nForce2 setup for the P4 lower timings = better
__________________ |
|
| |
|
3rd January 2004, 19:05
| #5 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,003
| I allready have a p4 setup right now, but only one stick of BH5, so no dual channel.. I intend to buy 2 sticks of mushkin memory BH5, not sure yet 
__________________ . |
|
| |
|
3rd January 2004, 19:09
| #6 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| you can do the test in SC, but 2-2-5 will outperform 2-2-8 (max value I think, no 11 available)
__________________ |
|
| |
|
3rd January 2004, 20:04
| #7 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| sc is not an option for comparison on a dual channel setup... you can never extrapolate the difference in single channel towards dual channel
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
| |
|
3rd January 2004, 20:14
| #8 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| only nForce2 shows increased performance with 2-2-11 as stated before. 2-2-8 on Intel will be slower then 2-2-5.
__________________ |
|
| |
|
3rd January 2004, 20:35
| #9 |
|
Posts: n/a
| will the difference between 2-2-2-5 and 2.5-3-3-7 on an Intel rig be comparable with the difference on and amd rig? Because the difference between them is =~ 430 3dmarks and it seems like everyone is selling their oc memory at this moment, so for a very small price, my rig could be running a lot faster and more stable than with this crappy apacer ram. |
| |
|
3rd January 2004, 20:42
| #10 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| you could get an increase of some percents, however... in realworld applications you won't notice anything...
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
