| Thread Tools |
20th February 2008, 12:54 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Part Deux One of the main criticisms of my initial benchmark tests was that I overlooked the fact that, under the hood, Windows Vista SP1 works differently to XP SP2 in the file copy department. The difference is down to caching and how Vista carried out uncached I/O while XP caches the files. On top of that is the further complication that the file transfer progress bars are coded to work differently. Vista’s file copy dialog box goes away when the cache is committed, while under XP the copy dialog goes away while the committal is still pending. In other words XP is coded to appear fast. http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1338
__________________ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Windows Vista SP1 vs SP2 Comparison | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 28th May 2009 15:35 |
Windows Vista SP2 Officialy Released | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th May 2009 14:53 |
Windows Vista SP1 vs Vista SP2 RC Performance Compared | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 5th February 2009 17:06 |
Windows Vista SP2 New Features Compared to SP1 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 2nd February 2009 19:28 |
Vista SP2 to have Blu-ray write support, better search | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 29th October 2008 03:51 |
Windows Vista SP1 Now Available to the Public | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 19th March 2008 12:49 |
A Second Shot: Windows Vista SP1 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 27th February 2008 22:50 |
List of Programs with know Issues in Vista SP1 | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 23rd February 2008 18:26 |
Release notes for Vista SP1 - or things that will break your computer | jmke | WebNews | 4 | 6th February 2008 13:03 |
Windows Vista Review, Part 3: Installing Windows Vista | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 11th November 2006 11:36 |
Thread Tools | |
| |