| Thread Tools |
8th August 2019, 14:48 | #1 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2010 Location: Romania
Posts: 153,541
| Tesla ordered to stop spinning safety numbers Watchdog growls at Tesla National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has told Tesla to stop embellishing its figures. The watchdog's growl comes from something which happened last October when Tesla claimed that its Model 3 had the "lowest probability of injury of any vehicle ever tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)". However, two days later the NHTSA, without naming Tesla, said its "5-star rating is the highest safety rating a vehicle can achieve" but that it "does not distinguish safety performance beyond that rating. Thus there wasno 'safest' vehicle among those vehicles achieving 5-star ratings". Ars Technica, citing documents obtained by the website Plainsite, discovered that the NHTSA told Tesla to stop making "misleading statements" about the Model 3's safety, as the company's use of NHTSA's 5-star ratings and associated data "is inconsistent with the NHTSA's guidelines". The NHTSA conducts a number of different crash tests for each vehicle and then issues a series of ratings ranging from one to five stars for different aspects of vehicle safety. There's no disputing that the Model 3 performed well on these tests, achieving five stars -- the agency's highest rating -- across the board. However, the NHTSA would have liked Tesla to stop there. Instead, Tesla dug into the NHTSA's data. As part of its evaluation process, the NHTSA calculates a number called a vehicle safety score, which the agency has characterised as "relative risk of injury". The agency then awards each vehicle a star rating based on VSS ranges. Tesla noticed that the Model 3 had a better VSS score than any other vehicle on the market. To Tesla's marketing team that meant that a Model 3 driver is less likely to be injured in a crash than a driver of any other vehicle. However, NHTSA argues that this is statistical malpractice because it doesn't take into account vehicle weight. In a vehicle-to-vehicle crash, the occupant of the heavier vehicle is less likely to be injured. The NHTSA's tests, which involve crashing a car into fixed objects, don't necessarily account for this difference. Tesla says it stands by the statements it made last October. https://fudzilla.com/news/automotive...safety-numbers |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tesla Model 3 receives a perfect safety rating from NHTSA | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 21st September 2018 09:48 |
Tesla offers 'immediate' Model 3 deliveries to boost sales numbers | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 10th September 2018 09:48 |
Tesla's key safety representative leaves for Waymo | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 14th May 2018 14:49 |
Tesla driver in fatal Autopilot crash ignored safety warnings | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 22nd June 2017 06:30 |
Tesla Model S safety concerns cost it Consumer Reports' top rating | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 26th April 2017 19:17 |
Mobileye bailed on Tesla over Autopilot safety concerns | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 19th September 2016 07:30 |
Tesla may have disabled the Model X's door safety sensors | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 3rd September 2016 20:03 |
Tesla recalls the Model X over rear seat safety | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 13th April 2016 08:28 |
Tesla's Model S aces European safety tests too | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 6th November 2014 07:53 |
Microsoft ordered to stop selling Word | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 12th August 2009 21:19 |
Thread Tools | |
| |