| Thread Tools |
27th October 2006, 11:06 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Radeon X1950 Pro CrossFire Performance Up to this point, one of the chief criticisms most users have had with ATI’s CrossFire technology has been ATI’s requirement of CrossFire master cards. Unlike regular Radeon graphics cards, the CrossFire master cards contain several extra chips which are used to handle the compositing and communication between GPUs. This makes the CrossFire cards slightly more expensive for ATI to produce, and thus with the exception of the Radeon X1950 XTX CrossFire, ATI charged slightly more for them. The CrossFire master cards also tend to be in shorter supply than regular Radeon cards and therefore when you can find them, they tend to be more expensive. This further complicates matters for ATI.
__________________ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sapphire Radeon HD 4770 512MB and CrossFire performance review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 5th May 2009 10:51 |
[M] Jetway Radeon X1950 Pro GDDR4 vs X1950 Pro GDDR3 Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 3rd June 2007 22:06 |
3-Way Radeon X1950 Pro Round Up - MSI, Gigabyte and Sapphire | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 27th March 2007 20:10 |
Sapphire Announces Radeon X1950 Pro AGP | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 1st December 2006 16:31 |
HIS IceQ3 Radeon X1950 Pro | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 2nd November 2006 12:11 |
Official ATI Radeon X1950 Pro Reviews: CrossFire Done Right | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 18th October 2006 08:17 |
ATI RV570 Radeon X1950 Pro Performance Unveiled | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 9th October 2006 12:15 |
Radeon X800 Pro - Doom 3 performance investigated | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 14th August 2004 14:43 |
Thread Tools | |
| |