| Thread Tools |
30th August 2005, 08:21 | #1 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| Performance Impact on Chaning Memory Size from 1GByte to 2 GByte Here's a short overview of the report: Battlefield 2 Flight Demo "We were very eager to run testing on Battlefield 2, as current user feedback indicated that this game performed much better with larger amounts of memory. As expected, the increase in memory array size from 1 GByte to 2 GByte had a very substantial performance impact on this game. We found that this to be the case regardless of processor platform, as well as regardless of screen resolution." Summary "The performance increase realized in real-world applications like Battlefield 2 and Permier elements indicate that the current generation of enthusiast systems will certainly benefit from the selection of 2 GByte memory arrays. These benefits will become greater in the next six months as new memory-intensive applications and games are brought to market." http://www.corsairmemory.com/corsair...1GB_vs_2GB.pdf
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
30th August 2005, 12:58 | #2 |
Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| hmm, we always knew this from battlefield, but other games like fear should be tested... and rts games, and all kinds of games...
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
30th August 2005, 13:36 | #3 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| no offence, but this test is biased as Battlefield is about the only game which benefits from 1->2Gb upgrade...
__________________ |
30th August 2005, 21:37 | #4 |
Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| that's what I meant... corsair telling us to upgrade from 1 to 2 gb based solely on battlefield2 is absurd
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
30th August 2005, 21:45 | #5 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| I get myself a game box instead.
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Windows 7 vs. Vista CPU & Memory Performance Comparison | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 28th August 2009 10:38 |
Intel Core i5 ES sports lackluster memory performance | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 29th April 2009 11:23 |
3GB vs. 6GB Memory Performance Analysis on X58 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 12th February 2009 18:25 |
Intel Atom 2GB Memory Performance (Linux) | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 12th January 2009 11:17 |
OCZ Technology Group Introduces New Flex EX Performance Memory Series | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 17th December 2008 10:31 |
Mushkin Announces XP3 DDR3 eXtreme Performance Memory Series | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 7th March 2008 13:25 |
Memory speed impact on Intel Core 2 Systems | jmke | WebNews | 5 | 3rd October 2007 18:06 |
Exploring the performance impact of memory latency | Sidney | WebNews | 1 | 1st November 2005 16:00 |
Ultra High Performance Memory Roundup A64 Socket 939 | jmke | Articles & Howto's | 35 | 14th June 2005 13:40 |
Memory Options and Performance on the Intel 955X Express Chip Set | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 2nd June 2005 21:18 |
Thread Tools | |
| |