Nvidia experiments with five year gagging orders

Stefan Mileschin · 28th June 2018, 20:05

Downgrading the press

The German website Heise has noticed that Nvidia's new non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) now last for five years and are more far reaching than product-specific information.

While most hacks will cheerfully sign an NDA if it will gain them access to new information and prepare their stories months in advance, normally non-disclosure agreements usually are product-specific and date-specific.

But the new NDA now applies to all information provided by Nvidia, so it did not refer to a specific product or information. There is no concrete expiration date. Nvidia has also put in lots of conditions that ran counter to basic journalistic principles.

Journalists are allowed to write only what fits Nvidia and is only allowed to be a marketing tool. This means that hacks who sign the NDA must be immediately discounted as reliable and not just for that story – any story which they mentioned Nvidia.

Mind you, this isn't the first time Nvidia has played around with this idea. In the days of The Inquirer, it also tried it on.

Our question then is... what has Nvidia got to hide?

https://fudzilla.com/news/graphics/4...gagging-orders

28th June 2018, 20:05	#1
Stefan Mileschin [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2010 Location: Romania Posts: 153,541	Nvidia experiments with five year gagging orders Downgrading the press The German website Heise has noticed that Nvidia's new non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) now last for five years and are more far reaching than product-specific information. While most hacks will cheerfully sign an NDA if it will gain them access to new information and prepare their stories months in advance, normally non-disclosure agreements usually are product-specific and date-specific. But the new NDA now applies to all information provided by Nvidia, so it did not refer to a specific product or information. There is no concrete expiration date. Nvidia has also put in lots of conditions that ran counter to basic journalistic principles. Journalists are allowed to write only what fits Nvidia and is only allowed to be a marketing tool. This means that hacks who sign the NDA must be immediately discounted as reliable and not just for that story – any story which they mentioned Nvidia. Mind you, this isn't the first time Nvidia has played around with this idea. In the days of The Inquirer, it also tried it on. Our question then is... what has Nvidia got to hide? https://fudzilla.com/news/graphics/4...gagging-orders

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
iPhone X Got Sold Out Within Minutes, New Orders Won't Ship Before End Of Year	Stefan Mileschin	WebNews	0	28th October 2017 17:29
Judge sides with Microsoft over gagging orders	Stefan Mileschin	WebNews	0	13th February 2017 07:52
Nvidia GTX 1080 Pre-Orders Sell Out In Minutes	Stefan Mileschin	WebNews	0	23rd May 2016 07:29
Amazon Orders More than 10,000 Nvidia Tesla K10 Cards, K20s to Follow?	Stefan Mileschin	WebNews	0	4th October 2012 11:44
nVidia has stopped taking orders for the GeForce GTX 470?	jmke	WebNews	0	20th May 2010 09:05
Nvidia: GPU Failures Not Affecting Our Orders	jmke	WebNews	0	9th June 2009 18:08
Nvidia increases 40nm orders	jmke	WebNews	0	24th May 2009 10:59
Palit cuts Nvidia GPU orders	jmke	WebNews	0	21st January 2009 18:23
NVIDIA 2007 Year in Review	Sidney	WebNews	0	24th December 2007 17:20
ATi & NVIDIA Placing More Orders With TSMC	jmke	WebNews	0	20th January 2007 00:31