It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Nehalem Bloomfield @ 2.93Ghz does SuperPi 1M in 13.969 Nehalem Bloomfield @ 2.93Ghz does SuperPi 1M in 13.969
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Nehalem Bloomfield @ 2.93Ghz does SuperPi 1M in 13.969
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 23rd June 2008, 20:55   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Icon17 Nehalem Bloomfield @ 2.93Ghz does SuperPi 1M in 13.969

Source: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...75#post3071075

Nehalem at 2933Mhz matches performance of Core 2 Duo at ~3600Mhz!
http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?di... lse&limit=20


Things get more interesting still when multithreading comes into play... in the same XS thread that Nehalem @ 2933Mhz score 9.218 seconds in Wprime 32M, this is on par with a QX9650 @ ~4700Mhz!!
http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?di...ls e&limit=20


more results attached from the XS thread!
Attached Thumbnails
nehalem-bloomfield-2-93ghz-does-superpi-1m-13-969-bloomfield_1.jpg nehalem-bloomfield-2-93ghz-does-superpi-1m-13-969-bloomfield_3.jpg nehalem-bloomfield-2-93ghz-does-superpi-1m-13-969-bloomfield_2.jpg nehalem-bloomfield-2-93ghz-does-superpi-1m-13-969-bloomfield_4.jpg nehalem-bloomfield-2-93ghz-does-superpi-1m-13-969-bloomfield_5.jpg nehalem-bloomfield-2-93ghz-does-superpi-1m-13-969-bloomfield-specs.png
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 23rd June 2008 at 21:23.
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2008, 21:26   #2
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

Well, a Skulltrail with 8 cores clocked at 3.2G scores 6,28s ... Nehalem is not thát good?

http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuM...true&limit=100
__________________
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2008, 21:27   #3
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

8 physical cores versus 4 physical cores with HT;
one mainboard with 2 Nehalem will annihilate Skulltrail
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nehalem and memory overclocking jmke WebNews 6 12th September 2008 08:56
Power gating and turbo mode: Intel talks Nehalem at IDF jmke WebNews 0 20th August 2008 16:04
Intel Nehalem System Build Pictorial ~ Comparison Galore jmke WebNews 1 6th August 2008 18:35
Intel Bloomfield pricing for distributors spotted jmke WebNews 5 16th July 2008 23:43
NVIDIA Brings SLI Technology to Intel Bloomfield CPU Platforms jmke WebNews 1 14th July 2008 23:13
Cat's out of the Bag: Intel Nehalem Benchmarked jmke WebNews 1 5th June 2008 21:37
Intel Atom 230 (1.6Ghz) 4W TDP does SuperPi 1M in 92.766 Seconds jmke WebNews 2 30th May 2008 16:49
Intel Nehalem, Bloomfield has 8MB of cache jmke WebNews 28 31st March 2008 10:04
Opening the Kimono: Intel Details Nehalem and Tempts with Larrabee jmke WebNews 0 18th March 2008 17:14

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:35.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO