| Thread Tools |
16th November 2011, 15:55 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Intel's Core i7-3960X processor Truly high-end desktop PCs have been in a curious position for nearly a year now. Intel's X58 platform and the corresponding Core i7-900-series processors have reigned supreme in their segment for three successive years, with little real competition from AMD. Yet in the 11 months since the debut of Intel's Sandy Bridge processors, this high-end platform hasn't been unequivocally faster than the more affordable mid-range options. The source of the trouble is pretty simple: newer technology. The Core i7-900 series is based on the older Nehalem CPU microarchitecture, and the newer Sandy Bridge architecture delivers substantially more performance in every clock cycle. Even the thousand-dollar Core i7-990X, with six cores and three memory channels, can't distance itself too much from its quad-core Sandy Bridge cousin, the Core i7-2600K. Thus, the X58's raison d'etre has largely been reduced to its utility as a vehicle for multi-GPU solutions. Since quad-core Sandy Bridge chips can only support dual eight-lane PCIe connections, the X58's more ample PCIe connectivity has been prized in certain circles. We can't say we've been part of those circles, though, since we've never been able to measure any real performance differences between SLI and CrossFire on an X58 and a Sandy Bridge rig. Heck, we even quit recommending the X58 as the basis for the beastly Double-Stuff Workstation in our famous system guides, subbing in a Core i7-2600K instead. In short, Intel's high-end platform has been in desperate need of a refresh. Fortunately, the time for that update has finally come, and Intel is looking to remove all doubt about who's the top dog, unleashing a massive new chip—known as Sandy Bridge-E, or Sandy Bridge Extreme—that doubles up on nearly every resource included in the quad-core versions of Sandy Bridge. If that prospect isn't enough to get you salivating, you probably don't associate a hunger-type response with computer performance, which is entirely normal. Still, some watering of the mouth in this case would help me build drama for the technical specs I'm about to catalog, so oblige me, if you would. µ http://techreport.com/articles.x/219...ch+Report %29
__________________ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intel Core i7-3960X - Sandy Bridge E Processor | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th November 2011 08:46 |
Intel's Core i7-3960X processor | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th November 2011 08:42 |
Intel Core i7 3960X Extreme | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th November 2011 08:38 |
ASUS ROG Rampage IV Extreme (X79) Review - Air Overclocking with Core i7-3960X | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th November 2011 07:47 |
Intel Core i7-3960X Processor Extreme Edition Review @Hi Tech Legion | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th November 2011 07:44 |
Intel Core i7 3960X Extreme Edition (LGA 2011) CPU Review | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th November 2011 07:43 |
OC3D: Intel Core i7-3960X Review | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th November 2011 07:39 |
Sandy Bridge E: Core i7 3930K and Core i7 3960X @ ocaholic | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th November 2011 07:38 |
Core i7-3960X About 47% Faster On Average Than Core i7-990X: Intel | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 22nd July 2011 15:46 |
Intel's Core i7-990X Extreme processor | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 2nd March 2011 15:38 |
Thread Tools | |
| |