 |  |  |  |  |
Intel admits Core Ultra 9 285K will be slower than i9-14900K
| |||||||||
|
Intel admits Core Ultra 9 285K will be slower than i9-14900K
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
15th October 2024, 08:08
| #1 |
| [M] Reviewer  Join Date: May 2010 Location: Romania
Posts: 153,242
 |  Intel admits Core Ultra 9 285K will be slower than i9-14900K The slide shows that Chipzilla acknowledges its 14900K is actually faster in gaming than the upcoming 285K. Compared to the 14900K, the 285K offers 261 average FPS, while the 14900K achieves 264 average FPS. The positive aspect is that the new architecture enables Intel to reduce power consumption to 447W (presumably for the entire system). https://fudzilla.com/news/59877-inte...than-i9-14900k |
|  |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
