 |  |  |  |  |
Crysis 32 vs 64-bit Vista Performance Comparison
| |||||||||
|
Crysis 32 vs 64-bit Vista Performance Comparison
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
30th October 2007, 09:32
| #1 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
 |  Crysis 32 vs 64-bit Vista Performance Comparison After much messing about in the very early hours of the morning, I finally worked out why the 64-bit version of Crysis would not run. For some reason in the Nvidia control panel when the V-Sync option is set to "Use the 3D application setting" and the Multi-display/mixed-GPU acceleration setting on "Multiple display performance mode" the 64-bit version would instantly lock up. Changing these settings to “Force On” and “Single display performance” allowed us to finally run the 64-bit version. The results were quite good... http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=698&p=7
__________________  |
|  |
|
30th October 2007, 09:50
| #2 |
|
Posts: n/a
| I hate Microsoft so much for 32 bit Vista >< |
| |
|
30th October 2007, 09:59
| #3 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| as if Vista is to blame for 32-bit... it's not as if there are tons of 64-bit drivers/applications out there;
__________________ |
|
| |
|
30th October 2007, 11:33
| #4 | |
|
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
| |
| |
|
30th October 2007, 11:40
| #5 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| it's not that simple, and you should know that  if they only made 64-bit, they would upset a lot of software developers, as their programs should be recoded for both 32-bit (2000/xp) and 64-bit (vista), doubling development costs...
__________________ |
|
| |
|
30th October 2007, 12:06
| #6 | |
|
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
| |
| |
|
30th October 2007, 12:09
| #7 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| well, no. Since most just ignore 64-bit Crytek is expection rather than rule
__________________ |
|
| |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ATI Catalyst 9.10 vs 9.11 Windows 7 Performance Comparison | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 23rd November 2009 10:23 |
| ATI Catalyst 9.7 vs 9.6 Vista Driver Performance Comparison | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 27th July 2009 15:52 |
| Windows 7 RC vs Vista SP1 Gaming Performance | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 27th April 2009 18:23 |
| Crossfire vs SLI Performance Comparison Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 27th April 2009 11:47 |
| Windows 7 vs. Vista VGA Performance Analysis | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 27th February 2009 15:04 |
| Crysis AA Performance: ATI HD4870X2 vs NVIDIA GTX 280 | jmke | WebNews | 5 | 21st August 2008 20:59 |
| Samsung and Microsoft Work Together to Improve SSD Performance in Vista | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 8th August 2008 17:17 |
| Vista Game Performance: Vista vs. XP and ATI vs. Nvidia | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 21st February 2007 16:49 |
| Unreal Tournament 2004 Server Performance: 32 bit vs 64 bit | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 4th August 2004 20:46 |
| UT2004 64 bit performance update | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 15th July 2004 11:10 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
