| Thread Tools |
18th December 2021, 05:40 | #1 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2010 Location: Romania
Posts: 153,575
| Courts turn on US republican social media laws Read the constitution before bothering us again Hours before Texas’ social media law, HB 20 was going to force social media to publish what ever the Republican politicians said as God's honest truth, the other branch of the executive told them to stop being so stupid. In Texas, a federal court blocked the Texas law for violating the First Amendment. The case is similar to one in Florida, which was blocked and is before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fifth Circuit will hear the appeal the Texas law, but it is unlikely that it will fly even in Texas. According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation the laws are retaliatory and obviously unconstitutional. If the laws are enacted, governments could regulate publishers about what content they host. So, if a social media site spikes a story from a Republican saying that black is white because the Bible told him so, the site has to publish it as accurate. Likewise, sites must publish the views of “conservative voices” like the KKK. Texas explicitly passed HB 20 to stop social media companies’ purported discrimination against conservative users. The court explained that this “announced purpose of balancing the discussion.” This is basically government manipulation that the First Amendment was supposed to stop. Ironically, HB 20 would destroy or prevent the emergence of even large conservative platforms, as they would have to accept user speech from across the political spectrum. So, Trump’s new site would not be able to stop lefties and real scientists from flooding their sites with facts that were against the site’s views – such as the earth being a globe. The court noted that companies like YouTube and Facebook remove millions of pieces of user content a month. It further said Facebook’s declaration in the case that it would be “impossible” to establish a system by December 1 compliant with the bill’s requirements for that many removals. As a result, platforms would stop removing content to avoid violating HB 20 -- an impermissible chill of First Amendment rights. https://fudzilla.com/news/54064-cour...ial-media-laws |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Australia plans laws to make social networks identify trolls | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 29th November 2021 09:09 |
Philippines most obsessed with social media | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 1st December 2020 16:04 |
The FBI plans more social media surveillance | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th July 2019 10:44 |
SAP founder worries about social media | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 4th September 2018 10:15 |
Egypt will subject popular social accounts to anti-fake news laws | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 19th July 2018 13:17 |
Obama warns against social media | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 29th December 2017 10:44 |
New data privacy laws will let Brits erase childhood social posts | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 10th August 2017 06:44 |
The CIA is investing in social media surveillance even more | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 18th April 2016 06:26 |
365 Days of Social Media @ TechReviewSource.com | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 6th January 2013 15:50 |
Google named official social platform of 2012 Republican National Convention | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 16th April 2012 08:08 |
Thread Tools | |
| |