It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Athlon FX-62 in 3Dmark06/Sandra/Q4 Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Athlon FX-62 in 3Dmark06/Sandra/Q4
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Athlon FX-62 in 3Dmark06/Sandra/Q4
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 7th June 2006, 18:15   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Athlon FX-62 in 3Dmark06/Sandra/Q4

Being across the world in Taipei at Computex presents many interesting and unique opportunities. One of these was our chance to sit down with an Intel Core2 Duo system - with no Intel representatives around. We had several unsupervised hours to fiddle with the system, running artificial and real-world benchmarks. To top it off, we also tested against an AMD Athlon 64 FX-62. Keep in mind that the Core 2 Duo Conroe system is running at 2.4Ghz vs. the FX-62 at 2.8Ghz. Both are equipped with ATI's X1900XTX graphics card, both running Catalyst 6.5 drivers. Finally, we managed to overclock the Core2, though we ran out of time before we could do more benchmarks
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006, 18:16   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

the Q4 chart at 1280x1024 4xAA/8xAF is even more fun and basically proves that the Core 2 Duo will mean nothing for gamers...
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006, 20:35   #3
Member
 
The Senile Doctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
The Senile Doctor Freshly Registered
Default

what's new these last 4 years?
__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world
The Senile Doctor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006, 22:17   #4
Member
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

New names; new monies; new advertising, adding up together you get nothing. Hence, i have invested big money on a 7600GT card
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2006, 01:18   #5
phlegm!
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jmke
the Q4 chart at 1280x1024 4xAA/8xAF is even more fun and basically proves that the Core 2 Duo will mean nothing for gamers...
If you're GPU-limited, it doesn't matter what chip you have past a certain point since it'll all come out the same. I think gamers will care when it comes to more CPU-limited games/scenarios or if they're trying to future-proof their rig. What it really shows me is how little the FX series should mean to gamers in the future, because it's pretty sad when a chip that's about half the price beats or ties you in just about everything.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2006, 01:43   #6
Rutar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Far Cry at 800x600 0xAA, 0xAF is much less taxing to the GPU (see bittech review), where we saw the differences more.


Also, Quake 4 can have more or less GPU limited benches, so how do we know?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2006, 17:51   #7
trickson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

from all I have seen about this New CPU from Intell it is not all that ! in my humble opinion that is . My CPU (Opteron 170) is a very close match . YES I said it and I have seen the benchmarks and did my own as well and I came very close in some and in others I have beaten it . I realy don't think Intell is all that . Yes it is "NEW" tech and a "NEW" generation of CPU but it is not all that IMHO ! Intell made another P4 with more cache is all and a NEW instruction set is all . and there is NO programe that can even use SSE4 so what good is that ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2006, 13:26   #8
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

either A64 or Core 2 will be plenty fast for gamers; if you already A64 switching to Core2 will not give you any tangilble in-game boost; that's what I'm saying
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2006, 15:54   #9
Member
 
The Senile Doctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
The Senile Doctor Freshly Registered
Default

in game as in 'in hi res hi quality gaming'
(stating the obvious @koensa)
__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world
The Senile Doctor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2006, 16:18   #10
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

can you explain to me which GPUs in what games are "bottlenecked" by the CPU, I would like to hear
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Processor Review thorgal WebNews 0 15th March 2007 11:08
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6600 Processor jmke WebNews 0 24th January 2007 11:09
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Energy Efficient and the Core 2 Duo E6300 jmke WebNews 0 8th August 2006 09:16
AMD will drop Athlon 64 X2 prices to compete with Intel Core 2 Duo jmke WebNews 0 13th July 2006 13:50
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 - Gaming and Workstation Benchmarks jmke WebNews 6 16th June 2006 23:38

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:32.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO