| Thread Tools |
7th June 2006, 18:15 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Athlon FX-62 in 3Dmark06/Sandra/Q4 Being across the world in Taipei at Computex presents many interesting and unique opportunities. One of these was our chance to sit down with an Intel Core2 Duo system - with no Intel representatives around. We had several unsupervised hours to fiddle with the system, running artificial and real-world benchmarks. To top it off, we also tested against an AMD Athlon 64 FX-62. Keep in mind that the Core 2 Duo Conroe system is running at 2.4Ghz vs. the FX-62 at 2.8Ghz. Both are equipped with ATI's X1900XTX graphics card, both running Catalyst 6.5 drivers. Finally, we managed to overclock the Core2, though we ran out of time before we could do more benchmarks
__________________ |
7th June 2006, 18:16 | #2 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| the Q4 chart at 1280x1024 4xAA/8xAF is even more fun and basically proves that the Core 2 Duo will mean nothing for gamers...
__________________ |
7th June 2006, 20:35 | #3 |
Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| what's new these last 4 years?
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
7th June 2006, 22:17 | #4 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| New names; new monies; new advertising, adding up together you get nothing. Hence, i have invested big money on a 7600GT card
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
8th June 2006, 01:18 | #5 | |
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
| |
8th June 2006, 01:43 | #6 |
Posts: n/a
| Far Cry at 800x600 0xAA, 0xAF is much less taxing to the GPU (see bittech review), where we saw the differences more. Also, Quake 4 can have more or less GPU limited benches, so how do we know? |
17th June 2006, 17:51 | #7 |
Posts: n/a
| from all I have seen about this New CPU from Intell it is not all that ! in my humble opinion that is . My CPU (Opteron 170) is a very close match . YES I said it and I have seen the benchmarks and did my own as well and I came very close in some and in others I have beaten it . I realy don't think Intell is all that . Yes it is "NEW" tech and a "NEW" generation of CPU but it is not all that IMHO ! Intell made another P4 with more cache is all and a NEW instruction set is all . and there is NO programe that can even use SSE4 so what good is that ? |
18th June 2006, 13:26 | #8 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| either A64 or Core 2 will be plenty fast for gamers; if you already A64 switching to Core2 will not give you any tangilble in-game boost; that's what I'm saying
__________________ |
18th June 2006, 15:54 | #9 |
Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| in game as in 'in hi res hi quality gaming' (stating the obvious @koensa)
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
18th June 2006, 16:18 | #10 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| can you explain to me which GPUs in what games are "bottlenecked" by the CPU, I would like to hear
__________________ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Processor Review | thorgal | WebNews | 0 | 15th March 2007 11:08 |
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6600 Processor | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 24th January 2007 11:09 |
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Energy Efficient and the Core 2 Duo E6300 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 8th August 2006 09:16 |
AMD will drop Athlon 64 X2 prices to compete with Intel Core 2 Duo | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 13th July 2006 13:50 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 - Gaming and Workstation Benchmarks | jmke | WebNews | 6 | 16th June 2006 23:38 |
Thread Tools | |
| |