A brief look at Intel's new Common Systems Interconnect (CSI)

jmke · 4th September 2007, 15:06

Back in January of 2006, I wrote a short article called "Intel has a major '06-'07 weak spot, and AMD is aiming right at it." That "weak spot" was, of course, Intel's aging shared bus architecture, which was then poised to drag down the company's superior processor architecture and leave AMD's Opteron + HyperTransport combination at the top of the multisocket server heap.

Well, here we are in 2007, and it has happened just like that. In a new whitepaper on Common Systems Interconnect (CSI), Intel's forthcoming answer to HyperTransport, David Kanter gives the following bit of retrospective on what is now recent history: "Intel’s platform shortcomings created a weakness that AMD exploited to gain significant market share. It is estimated that Intel currently holds as little as 50% of the market for MP servers, compared to roughly 75-80% of the overall market."

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post...nnect-csi.html

4th September 2007, 18:58

Intel is projected to move away from FB-DIMMs now? I thought that was just speculation. Would be a smart idea if they would....

If Intel designed the CSI bus to be easily ported from a copper to a optical based system, then I take it they plan to be using CSI for at least as long as the FSB...

4th September 2007, 15:06	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,022	A brief look at Intel's new Common Systems Interconnect (CSI) Back in January of 2006, I wrote a short article called "Intel has a major '06-'07 weak spot, and AMD is aiming right at it." That "weak spot" was, of course, Intel's aging shared bus architecture, which was then poised to drag down the company's superior processor architecture and leave AMD's Opteron + HyperTransport combination at the top of the multisocket server heap. Well, here we are in 2007, and it has happened just like that. In a new whitepaper on Common Systems Interconnect (CSI), Intel's forthcoming answer to HyperTransport, David Kanter gives the following bit of retrospective on what is now recent history: "Intel’s platform shortcomings created a weakness that AMD exploited to gain significant market share. It is estimated that Intel currently holds as little as 50% of the market for MP servers, compared to roughly 75-80% of the overall market." http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post...nnect-csi.html __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
CoolIT Systems Acquires Delphi Liquid Cooling Assets	jmke	WebNews	0	27th April 2009 21:50
CoolIT Systems Unleashes the Boreas CPU/GPU Cooler	jmke	WebNews	0	1st November 2007 21:06
CoolIT Systems Extends Liquid Cooling Technology to the Workstation/Server Market	jmke	WebNews	0	23rd October 2007 19:45
Intel's CSI to outperform AMD's Hypertransport	jmke	WebNews	5	13th December 2005 16:27
Intel's 65nm Processors Overclocking Preview: 4.5Ghz no problem	jmke	WebNews	2	25th October 2005 22:50
ATI is Graphics Provider of Choice for New OEM PCI Express Systems	Sidney	WebNews	0	25th June 2004 00:12
General Micro Systems First to Offer Single Board Computer Based on Pentium M Process	Sidney	WebNews	0	24th June 2004 23:59
ATI is graphics provider of choice for new OEM PCI Express systems	jmke	WebNews	0	22nd June 2004 17:28
ABIT Announces Partnership with PWX Systems	jmke	WebNews	0	13th January 2004 14:14

4th September 2007, 18:58	#2
Kougar Posts: n/a	Intel is projected to move away from FB-DIMMs now? I thought that was just speculation. Would be a smart idea if they would.... If Intel designed the CSI bus to be easily ported from a copper to a optical based system, then I take it they plan to be using CSI for at least as long as the FSB...