It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Backblaze Analyzes SSD Reliability Backblaze Analyzes SSD Reliability
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Backblaze Analyzes SSD Reliability
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 25th February 2019, 10:42   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 153,541
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Backblaze Analyzes SSD Reliability

BackBlaze regularly posts failure rates for their substantial collection of hard drives, and according to the results they published last month, they have over 100,000 of them to test. But as we've recently noted, flash memory prices are dropping like a rock, hence solid state drives are quickly becoming a somewhat economical alternative to 7200 RPM spinners. But just how reliable are these drives? According to a recent blog post, BackBlaze thinks that SSDs are "generally" more reliable than HDDs under most workloads, though the factors that affect SSD reliability are different. As their name would suggest, SSDs have no moving parts, hence they're more tolerant to shock, vibration, and temperature changes, but that also means that users get no audible indicators when they do start failing. Flash memory can eventually wear out too, and it can wear out relatively quickly in QLC SSDs, but Backblaze says "SSDs can be expected to last as long or longer than HDDs in most general applications." Unfortunately, the backup company isn't backing up their claims with hard data yet, but other publications have torture tested SSDs before, and I expect it won't be long before Backblaze starts posting SSD failure rates as well. Thanks to AceGoober for the tip. SSDs are a different breed of animal than a HDD and they have their strengths and weaknesses relative to other storage media. The good news is that their strengths -speed, durability, size, power consumption, etc. - are backed by pretty good overall reliability. SSD users are far more likely to replace their storage drive because they're ready to upgrade to a newer technology, higher capacity, or faster drive, than having to replace the drive due to a short lifespan. Under normal use we can expect an SSD to last years. If you replace your computer every three years, as most users do, then you probably needn't worry about whether your SSD will last as long as your computer. What's important is whether the SSD will be sufficiently reliable that you won't lose your data during its lifetime.

http://www.hardocp.com/news/2019/02/...d_reliability/
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2018 Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 28th January 2019 09:09
The Pixel 3's most important feature needs to be reliability Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 8th October 2018 18:24
Backblaze fires off its 2017 hard drive reliability report Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 5th February 2018 06:14
Microsoft claims Surface reliability isn't really that bad Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 13th August 2017 14:20
Backblaze: Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2017 Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 10th May 2017 06:38
LG G6 Boasts Better Safety and Reliability Standards Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 26th February 2017 19:48
These are the most reliable hard drives, according to Backblaze Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 4th February 2017 14:38
Backblaze Storage Pod 6.0 puts 60 3.5" drives in 4U of space Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 27th April 2016 07:15
Withings Hy-result analyzes your blood pressure Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 10th February 2016 09:48

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO