| Thread Tools |
28th January 2008, 14:42 | #2 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| HardOCP's review is definitely worth a look, together with the one from techreport, those results are pretty much in-line, using similar bench methods; the X2 is good, but price/performance wise it's not the best out there.
__________________ |
28th January 2008, 14:58 | #3 |
Posts: n/a
| It's not just price/performance that is problematic: Size, power consumption and heat are suboptimal too. |
28th January 2008, 15:02 | #4 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| compared to the GTX & Ultra the X2 does do better
__________________ |
28th January 2008, 15:06 | #5 |
Posts: n/a
| |
28th January 2008, 15:10 | #6 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| the GTS comes close in performance but not that close, the GT drags behind even more, you need SLI, which is at $500 to get ahead again. one GTX is $400 and will offer more PNP performance
__________________ |
Thread Tools | |
| |