| Thread Tools |
1st June 2009, 19:23 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| AMD's Six-Core Opteron 2435 Do Six Cores Make Sense? The question is not theoretical. When Intel launched their hex-core “Dunnington”, quite a few applications did not make good use of it. The quad-socket “Istanbul”-based servers will face the same problems as “Dunnington”: some server applications prefer “2n cores”, a few will not scale above eight cores and many will not get past 16 very successfully. Yes, even in the server world, quite many applications do not scale well beyond 8-16 cores. Mailservers, webservers and even some databases may be in that situation. If your database gets a lot of locks on the same amount of data, locking contention will kill off your performance once you get beyond a certain number of cores. Rendering applications are another group that start to show diminishing returns with more than 8 cores. It is pretty likely that clustering dual-socket quad-cores makes more sense that adding more cores to the same machine. http://it.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=3571
__________________ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMD's 65nm Brisbane Core Previewed: The most energy efficient AMD CPU to date | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th December 2006 08:45 |
AMD's Opteron 165 and 180 processors | Sidney | WebNews | 2 | 23rd February 2006 19:10 |
Opteron 165 Toledo Core Overclocking With High End Air | Sidney | WebNews | 3 | 10th November 2005 17:17 |
AMD's Athlon 64 X2 4800+ & 4200+ Dual Core Performance | Sidney | WebNews | 5 | 9th May 2005 20:23 |
AMD's dual core Opteron & Athlon 64 X2 - Server/Desktop Performance Preview | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 21st April 2005 23:03 |
AMD's Q1 2004 Opteron Sales Surpass the Whole 2004 Figure | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 17th June 2004 09:53 |
Thread Tools | |
| |