It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
AMD Preps Low-Cost Dual-Core Processors AMD Preps Low-Cost Dual-Core Processors
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


AMD Preps Low-Cost Dual-Core Processors
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 29th June 2006, 10:07   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
AMD Preps Low-Cost Dual-Core Processors

Advanced Micro Devices once offered premium technologies at very affordable pricing, however, once times changed, it became more conservative and kept the finest parts for those, who can afford. But as Intel Corp. attacks with affordable dual-core chips, AMD has to react and this reaction could follow in the fourth quarter with the intro of AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+.
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2006, 10:53   #2
FireTech
 
Posts: n/a
Default

We're sorry, but the page you are trying to read was not found on this server, please return to the /mainpage
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2006, 04:45   #3
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default AMD X2 3600+

You can read the Dailytech article on it here: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3099

Basically, this is two Semprons joined at the hip, since this is 2x256kb L2 cache. It it designed to undercut Intel's low end $183 Conroe...

Quote:
HKEPC has also come across the 3600+, claiming it will ship in Q4'06 for a price of $139 to $159. Given that AMD is expected to announce major CPU price cuts near the end of July, the $139 price tag fits in with the rest of AMD's pricing. Intel's lowest-bin Conroe, the 1.86GHz Core 2 Duo processor, is expected to ship with a price of around $183. In contrast, the 3.0GHz Presler NetBurst processor is expected to hover around $133 at the same time HKEPC claims the X2 3600+ may ship.
Something to keep in mind is that while both the E6300 and X2 3600+ will have half the L2 cache, the Intel part will hold a big advantage... Either core of Conroe can utilize the entire 2mb of cache as needed, while the 3600+ is stuck using 256kb cache per core. So it is no better than two Semprons double-teamed...
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2006, 18:51   #4
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

I made a booboo :§
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Announces Widespread Availability and Broad Global OEM Support for New Quad-Core jmke WebNews 0 13th November 2008 17:17
AMD Phenom X4 9350e Low Cost Quad Core jmke WebNews 0 3rd August 2008 11:23
AMD quad core draws less power than Dual Core jmke WebNews 0 5th June 2007 21:28
ATI and AMD Drive the Market for Dual Core Leadership jmke WebNews 0 1st June 2005 14:10
AMD Dual core arrives in Taiwan Liquid3D WebNews 1 1st June 2005 14:08
Dual Core AMD Processors Sidney WebNews 0 10th May 2005 05:51
Upgrading to dual core Opterons is low cost affair Sidney WebNews 0 11th April 2005 00:24
AMD dual processors to be available on launch day jmke WebNews 0 8th April 2005 12:25
AMD Rev E Dual Core CPUs Info jmke WebNews 0 13th August 2004 13:12
AMD Introduces Line of Low-Power, High-Performance AMD Geode Embedded x86 Processors Sidney WebNews 0 24th May 2004 07:10

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:45.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO