64-bit is old hat, Microsoft mulling 128-bit versions of Windows

jmke · 9th October 2009, 16:50

Believe it or not, Windows 7's successor(s) have been in the planning and early development stages for a while now. We haven't posted anything about any of them yet, but we've been watching closely to see if anything really interesting turned up. Exactly two weeks ago, it did. A LinkedIn profile, which has already been taken down, for a Robert Morgan, Senior Research & Development at Microsoft, has shone a sliver of light on the possibility of 128-bit support coming to Windows 8.

http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/new...-windows-9.ars

9th October 2009, 20:01

Software still won't support it until 64 bit is turned off, MS failed to axe 32bit with Windows 7 so I don't expect them to get it right this time

10th October 2009, 12:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rutar

Software still won't support it until 64 bit is turned off, MS failed to axe 32bit with Windows 7 so I don't expect them to get it right this time

7 was supposed to be 64bit only, but probably because Vista x64 wasn't a great succes (id Vista wasn't a success overall

) and x64 driver support is still too basic to push the market in x64.

When Windows 8 comes out, 64-bit support should be much better and not bringing out a 32-bit version of Windows 8 wouldn't be as catastrophic for sales as not brining out a 32-bit version of Windows 7.

10th October 2009, 22:14

What's wrong with 64bit right now? There isn't any reason to go with 32bit due to 64-bit driver support anymore, in my humble opinion.

10th October 2009, 22:19

That is the point, there was no reason to relase a 32bit Version of 7 and now it stalls 64 bit software development.

11th October 2009, 10:36

There are still a lot of programs that don't work on 64-bit systems, 64-bit drivers aren't always available either (or they can't be installed because they aren't signed) and in office environments 64-bit isn't necessary because you don't need 4Gb of RAM to use Office...

11th October 2009, 13:14

chicken-egg problem, if you don't force developers to code in 64 bit they won't

11th October 2009, 14:07

Definitely agree on that one, but Microsoft probably didn't have much choice because of bad Vista sales and Seven has to make up for these bad sales (and a 64-bit only versions probably wouldn't do that).

jmke · 11th October 2009, 14:24

plenty of 32bit only CPUs out there

11th October 2009, 14:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmke

plenty of 32bit only CPUs out there

Source?

Would those systems even recieve an OS upgrade?

Microsoft had a choice because it is Microsoft.

Apple is cutting off old system support in new OSes and almost noone complains.

9th October 2009, 16:50	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,022	64-bit is old hat, Microsoft mulling 128-bit versions of Windows Believe it or not, Windows 7's successor(s) have been in the planning and early development stages for a while now. We haven't posted anything about any of them yet, but we've been watching closely to see if anything really interesting turned up. Exactly two weeks ago, it did. A LinkedIn profile, which has already been taken down, for a Robert Morgan, Senior Research & Development at Microsoft, has shone a sliver of light on the possibility of 128-bit support coming to Windows 8. http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/new...-windows-9.ars __________________

11th October 2009, 14:24	#9
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,022	plenty of 32bit only CPUs out there __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Microsoft Patch Tuesday: 5 Criticals, 2 Important, 1 Moderate Patch	jmke	WebNews	0	14th April 2009 19:47
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for September 2008	jmke	WebNews	0	9th September 2008 20:20
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for August 2007	jmke	WebNews	0	14th August 2007 23:21
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for February 2007	jmke	WebNews	0	14th February 2007 01:25
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for June 2006	jmke	WebNews	0	14th June 2006 21:51
Microsoft Unveils Windows Vista Product Lineup - 6 versions	jmke	WebNews	0	27th February 2006 13:24
List of fixes included in Windows XP Service Pack 2	jmke	WebNews	1	17th August 2004 16:03
ATI Supports Development of Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition	jmke	WebNews	0	14th July 2004 13:29
Microsoft and STMicroelectronics Team to Enable High-Definition Windows Media 9 Conte	Sidney	WebNews	0	8th June 2004 07:47
Microsoft Changes Mind on Windows 98 Support	jmke	WebNews	0	13th January 2004 13:04

9th October 2009, 20:01	#2
Rutar Posts: n/a	Software still won't support it until 64 bit is turned off, MS failed to axe 32bit with Windows 7 so I don't expect them to get it right this time

10th October 2009, 22:14	#4
Kougar Posts: n/a	What's wrong with 64bit right now? There isn't any reason to go with 32bit due to 64-bit driver support anymore, in my humble opinion.

10th October 2009, 22:19	#5
Rutar Posts: n/a	That is the point, there was no reason to relase a 32bit Version of 7 and now it stalls 64 bit software development.

11th October 2009, 10:36	#6
wutske Posts: n/a	There are still a lot of programs that don't work on 64-bit systems, 64-bit drivers aren't always available either (or they can't be installed because they aren't signed) and in office environments 64-bit isn't necessary because you don't need 4Gb of RAM to use Office...

11th October 2009, 13:14	#7
Rutar Posts: n/a	chicken-egg problem, if you don't force developers to code in 64 bit they won't

11th October 2009, 14:07	#8
wutske Posts: n/a	Definitely agree on that one, but Microsoft probably didn't have much choice because of bad Vista sales and Seven has to make up for these bad sales (and a 64-bit only versions probably wouldn't do that).