| Thread Tools |
25th February 2013, 09:41 | #1 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2010 Location: Romania
Posts: 153,514
| 3DMark Review @ OCC Overall this 3DMark is definitely proving to be a powerful tool with its many options, though they are only available to those who purchase a license. Even with the Basic edition though, you have access to the default tests, which is all that matters for comparing results and showing off your graphical prowess. It will be very interesting to see what happens once the mobile device versions are released though; these will usher in a consistent benchmarking tool for the most popular non-console gaming platforms currently available. http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...mark13writeup/ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Futuremark 3DMark Review @ Neoseeker | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 14th February 2013 10:10 |
3DMark 2013 review: 52 graphic cards tested with the new benchmarks | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 5th February 2013 07:44 |
Futuremark 3DMark 11 Updated to v1.0.3 | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th December 2011 07:44 |
Will you buy, Would you buy: 3DMark Vantage | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 25th June 2008 10:05 |
3Dmark 06 download. | Gamer | Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding | 1 | 18th January 2006 15:34 |
Overclocking P4 660 to 6Ghz and new 3DMark WR | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 28th November 2005 01:55 |
Low 3dMark 2k1 score | StaRflaM | Hardware/Software Problems, Bugs | 4 | 17th August 2004 20:59 |
3DMARK 04 Previewed | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 9th August 2004 14:57 |
Next 3DMark Info | jmke | WebNews | 4 | 21st April 2004 14:54 |
problem with 3dmark 2001SE | ModdiN MansoN | Hardware/Software Problems, Bugs | 1 | 28th March 2003 07:38 |
Thread Tools | |
| |