| Thread Tools |
15th September 2004, 12:22 | #1 |
Posts: n/a
| what 754? I'm looking to buy a socket 754 cpu, but I was wondering which one would be the best to oc. I mean, since the multipliers are locked which one would I buy best. Experiences are also welcomed. sincerely, Randy |
15th September 2004, 12:35 | #2 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| 3000+/3200+ are okay if you like 2400-2600Mhz overclocks if you are on a tight budget, the 2800+ A64 or 3100+ Sempron might be worth considering also
__________________ |
15th September 2004, 12:38 | #3 |
Posts: n/a
| Semprons stink for overclocking though... and you'll need a board with a working AGP/PCI lock with the 2800 for sure, with the other two you might need it. |
15th September 2004, 12:48 | #4 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| 2.2ghz Sempron is far from bad in my humble opinion "By disabling and changing up various AGP and PCI components, we were able to go to 2.2 GHz, so the lack of AGP and PCI locking really was the culprit. " http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardwar.../3261_3398581/ more: http://www.amdboard.com/sempron_3100.html
__________________ |
15th September 2004, 12:57 | #5 |
Posts: n/a
| agp and pci locks will pose no problems (will buy the lp ut 250gb), so I'll probably go with a 3200. thx guys!!!! |
15th September 2004, 13:04 | #6 | |
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
Just my 2ct | |
15th September 2004, 13:08 | #7 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| overclocking point of view is most bang for the buck. since the Sempron 3100+ costs less but doesn't do 64-bit, you have a fast CPU for use now, which overclockers far from bad. and once 64-bit WinXP is there, you will be able to pick up a new or used A64 for a price lower then you paid for the 3100+ €125 http://www.prijswatch.be/prod.php?pg=toon&pid=12948
__________________ |
15th September 2004, 18:03 | #8 |
Posts: n/a
| newcastle cores overclock the best go 3200+ if you have the money, definately, the flexibility of a higher multiplier is good |
16th September 2004, 18:28 | #9 |
Posts: n/a
| id go at least 3200 as well, 1mb cache you know.....1MB!!!! |
16th September 2004, 18:53 | #10 |
Posts: n/a
| clawhammers (1mb cache ,)) are near impossible to find, there are still some very expensive 3400's for sale here and there but the 3200 clawhammer? Tell me where (and what stepping) and I'm buying right away |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMD Socket 939 and 754 End-of-Life Dates | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 22nd June 2006 13:58 |
AMD Socket 754 to Outlast Socket 939 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 31st March 2006 18:42 |
EPoX EP-8NPA SLI AMD Athlon 64 Socket 754 PCIe SLI motherboard | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th January 2006 19:50 |
Socket 754 DFI nForce 4 and Epox nForce 4 SLI Reviews | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 17th November 2005 15:37 |
AMD Sempron 2600+ for Socket 754: K8 Architecture Made More Affordable | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 7th March 2005 14:08 |
AOpen n250a-FR Socket 754 Motherboard | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 17th February 2005 11:18 |
AMD readies launch of Sempron 3300+ 754 | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 27th January 2005 16:58 |
AMD Semprons to migrate to 754 pins only | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 8th December 2004 17:04 |
Elitegroup ECS 755-A2 Socket 754 Motherboard | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 13th November 2004 14:16 |
Socket 754 Roundup, Part 3: Asus, Soltek & DFI | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 14th September 2004 11:58 |
Thread Tools | |
| |