| Thread Tools |
11th May 2008, 16:40 | #1 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
| PC chips M590 voltage modifications PC chips M590 - 2-168pin DIMM slot (4/8/16/32/64/128/256meg SDRAM pc-66/100) - Embedded 64 bit 3D AGP Graphics Accelerator with 4/8MB frame buffer - 1024K Onboard Pipelined Burst synchronous L2 cache - PC100 / SiS 5591 Pentium chipset - 321pin ZIF socket 7 which supports these processors: INTEL Pentium 90~350MHz P54C, P55C MMX Cyrix/IBM 6x86/6x86L/6x86MX/MII, IDT C6,and AMD K5/K6/K6-2 CPUs - Supports 60/66/75/83/100 MHz external clock speeds - onboard 3D sound pro Last edited by geoffrey : 14th August 2008 at 16:27. |
11th May 2008, 17:46 | #2 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
| Locate the K34063A IC. CLK Clock input. Provides fundamental timing for the processor. BF0-2 Bus Frequency clock multiplier (bus to core frequency ratio). 1.5x and 2.0x when only BF0 is present. 1.5x, 2.0x, 2.5x, and 3.0x when BF0 and BF1 are present. 2.0x, 2.5x, 3.0x, 3.5x, 4.0x, 4.5x, 5.0x, and 5.5x when BF0, BF1, and BF2 are present. [ Note: What multipliers are available is entirely dependent on the processor itself. ] |
11th May 2008, 20:31 | #3 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
| Using AMD K6 350MHz, I can choose following FSB settings: 60MHz 66MHz 83MHz 75MHz 100MHz Multipliers: 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 Unfortunately there is a glitch in the BIOS, when using the 100MHz FSB setting I noticed how the multipliers settings did not match with what is applied in real life. Using multi 5 whould set the multiplier to 4.5 in real life. This happens only when using the 100MHz FSB settings, for the whole range of available multi's. Downside is that the highest I can set my CPU at is 500MHz (100x5.5), which is just barely higher then 85x5.5 (470MHz CPU). Record is at 550MHz for now, I know I can easily hit that speed if the mainboard would not have the glitch. I noticed how the ASUS P5A allows up to 120MHz FSB, this would bring me at 600MHz. Might require phase change cooling though. I really need own PLL for CPU. EDIT: might want to check out this: http://www.unixload.de/netvista/ Last edited by geoffrey : 11th May 2008 at 20:34. |
11th May 2008, 23:29 | #4 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| Excellent, I have the same motherboard lying around, I have the Asus P5A as well and have another board coming to me from germany. Revival of the K6!! |
12th May 2008, 14:57 | #5 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
| 500MHz boot: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=734683 |
12th May 2008, 15:21 | #6 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| don't pollute the HWbot
__________________ |
13th May 2008, 17:59 | #7 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
| What, no valid entry? Others do it too, no penalty for them? |
17th May 2008, 16:06 | #8 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
| Pentium 1 166MHz MMX Test Stock: 66MHz FSB x 2,5 multiplier = 166MHz Test results: 100MHz FSB x 2x multiplier = boot, nice: CPU will like the bandwidth 100Mhz x 2,5 = boot 100Mhz x 3 = boot 100Mhz x 4 = boot 100Mhz x 5 = boot 100Mhz x 5,5 = boot ....... wait a minute, is that even possible???? For the 100MHz x 5,5 (550MHz) I had to increase CPU voltage up to 3,4V, but considering it is aircooled I began to question if that was even possible. That's more then triple its original speed... So, I let it boot into windows, there I noticed that the CPU speed is at only 314MHz (windows system readout). In real life I don't think that the clock speed shown at system boot is not correct, to far beyond specs and others seem to hit only around 300MHz using same type of cooling. Hwbot scores: http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?...66Mhz+%2874%29 Still good enough for me to get the gold medals, only have to get the USB interface working so that I can start installing software. I only wonder where all these verifications files went to, almost no entry has a picture included Anyway, I think this is a very good example why you should not accept system boot screenshots |
18th May 2008, 04:35 | #9 | |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| promising bootup OC, indeed unbelievable clocks on air; too bad it didn't last until windows CPU-Z ranking is CPU-Z ranking what do you mean with Quote:
__________________ | |
18th May 2008, 12:38 | #10 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 Voltage Modifications | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 11th April 2010 14:56 |
Hot Chips: Intel's dual-core Pentium 4 a rush job | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 18th August 2005 21:32 |
INFO: RAM List: What Chips on what Memory | jmke | FAQ / INFO / HOW-TO | 3 | 23rd April 2005 18:13 |
OCZ Announces EL PC-3200 Voltage eXtreme Gold Edition | jmke | WebNews | 5 | 31st December 2004 12:26 |
AMD’s 90nm Chips Dissipate 67W, Claims AMD | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 25th October 2004 02:40 |
ATI Technologies Readies New R430, RV410 Graphics Chips | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 12th July 2004 10:00 |
ATI Technologies Readies New R430, RV410 Graphics Chips | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 8th July 2004 20:17 |
AMD Reaches Performance Everest with New 64-bit Chips | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 1st June 2004 15:01 |
AMD Targets to Counter Strike Intel with Dual-Core Chips in 2005 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 23rd May 2004 10:50 |
University Develops Ion Cooling Device: Nano-Lightning to Cool Future Chips | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 29th March 2004 08:59 |
Thread Tools | |
| |