| Thread Tools |
3rd December 2004, 03:21 | #1 |
Posts: n/a
| Buying which? AMD 3000+ AMD 3200+ AMD 3500+ I'll be buying a new PC soon.. I was planning to buy an AMD 3500+ but I heard from Kristos that the AMD 3000+ and AMD 3200+ are jewels if it comes to overclocking? whatever CPU it is, I'll buy a Winchester.. no Newcastle. (and of course if I buy an AMD 3000+ or an AMD 3200+ a socket 939) Now.. Kristos said the AMD 3500+ isn't that good overclockable? Not as good as the AMD 3200+ and AMD 3000+ are? I heard it's definetly possible if you overclock your AMD 3000+ or an AMD 3200+ to the same prestations as an AMD 3500+ has (that isn't overclocked) From that niveau it's more about how many luck you have with your setup? What about the AMD 3500+ in general? Can it overclock far? If I would need to chose between an AMD 3000+ and an AMD 3200+.. which one to pick? they both are on 2.0ghz, price difference is around 50€. prices in belgium for the 3 CPU'S: Amd Athlon 3500+: around 270€ Amd Athlon 3200+: around 200€ Amd Athlon 3000+: around 150€ Which type of mainboard you have has a big influence for how far you can overclock your CPU right? I'm planning to buy an nForce 4 mainboard.. don't know which one, the Asus A8N-Sli looks interesting.. (= http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatal...ocket_939.html) Do you know reviews online of this mainboard? I checked: www.anandtech.com, www.hardocp.com and www.amdzone.com and I saw no review of that mainboard.. I'd like to know if it's a good mainboard if it comes to overclocking my CPU and graka! |
3rd December 2004, 04:43 | #2 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| Care to read some of the great articles presented by [M] reviews? Your answers may be in front of your eyes. http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=230 http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=24 4 http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=25 4
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
3rd December 2004, 09:28 | #3 |
Posts: n/a
| definatly the 3200+, especially when you oc on air, you have the adavantage of the 10x multiplier, so when your motherboard dousn't allows high fsb's you can still up the mp for a higher oc! |
3rd December 2004, 11:57 | #4 |
Posts: n/a
| I'll read the reviews in an hour.. I need some other things to do first. PS: can someone answer on my mainboard question? "Which type of mainboard you have has a big influence for how far you can overclock your CPU right? I'm planning to buy an nForce 4 mainboard.. don't know which one, the Asus A8N-Sli looks interesting.. (= http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatal...ocket_939.html) Do you know reviews online of this mainboard? I checked: www.anandtech.com, www.hardocp.com and www.amdzone.com and I saw no review of that mainboard.. I'd like to know if it's a good mainboard if it comes to overclocking my CPU and graka!" |
3rd December 2004, 12:02 | #5 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| not sure.. but reviews are plenty http://www.google.be/search?hl=nl&q=...i+Review&meta= but these don't include much OC results, since the nForce4 chipset is not yet widely available
__________________ |
3rd December 2004, 12:58 | #6 |
Posts: n/a
| so there are no decent nForce 4 reviews where they fully tested the OC abbility's? I probably need to buy on feeling than.. which brand is knowable of overclocking? ASUS? MSI? ABIT? Gigabyte? Or doesn't the mainboard influence how far you can overclock with your processor? |
3rd December 2004, 13:00 | #7 | |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Quote:
__________________ | |
3rd December 2004, 13:24 | #8 | |
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
PS: I read the article: http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=23 0 it's quite obviously that the AMD Athlon 3200+ 90rm gives better prestations than the AMD Athlon 3500+ 130nm but.. ain't that fair to compare a Winchester CPU with a Newcastle CPU? Does someone have benchmarks where they compare an overclocked AMD 3200+ 90nm with an AMD 3500+ 90nm in some games etc? | |
3rd December 2004, 13:39 | #9 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| uhm.. and Athlon 3200+ gives a little bit better performance when CLOCKED EQUALLY to 3500+ in all other cases 3500+ wins "but it's not because they aren't in the stores yet there can't be reviews yeh?" no OC reviews that's for sure
__________________ |
3rd December 2004, 16:37 | #10 |
Posts: n/a
| When you quote me, replicate it exact I said I wouldn't go for the 3500+ because I haven't heard or seen any amazing results of it yet. I said that amongst the 3000+ and 3200+, there are some real overclocking gems but not all of them perform so amazingly. I said I'd go for the 3000+ because in dispite of the fact that it's the lowest rated 90nm, I've noticed that most of those amazing overclocks were achieved with 3000+ models and a few were with 3200+ models. I also said that higher rating doesn't guarantee higher overclock and I pointed you towards beerkes posts in the superpi thread where he states that his 3000+ reached 2700 mhz rather stable but his 3200+ wouldn't make it to 2600 mhz. |
Thread Tools | |
| |