 |  |  |  |  |
40.71 vs 44.03
| |||||||||
|
40.71 vs 44.03
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
14th May 2003, 18:43
| #1 |
|
Posts: n/a
|  40.71 vs 44.03 It's like this: with 40.71 and 41.09 I get a reasonable nature score: 56 fps with 44.03 most scores are higher, the dragothic test rises pretty much, but the nature score "zuigt ezelballen door een rietje". What can I do to improve nature score with 44.03 ? http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6477879 (44.03) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6474600 (40.71) |
|
14th May 2003, 19:55
| #2 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,003
 | nature test is almost fully core intensitive check with rivatuner for any changes in AA and AF settings. Maybe the drivers changed that |
|
|
14th May 2003, 21:05
| #3 |
|
Posts: n/a
| 43.51 vs 44.03 C'mon, where are those 3D Mark specialists ?   |
|
14th May 2003, 21:40
| #4 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
 | http://www.tech-report.com/etc/2003q...x/index.x?pg=1  The GeForce FX cards see massive performance gains in 3DMark2001 SE with the new Detonator FX drivers. Where are those significantly higher scores coming from? Everywhere. 3DMark2001 SE's Dragothic and Nature game tests are particular favorites of the Detonator FX drivers, which transform the GeForce FX cards from bottom-dwellers to competitive performers
__________________  |
|
|
|
14th May 2003, 21:45
| #5 |
|
Posts: n/a
| " Nature game tests are particular favorites " How come my nature score decreased from 60 fps to 30 fps ? |
|
14th May 2003, 21:46
| #6 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| ideal test would be clean OS install then drivers clean OS then other drivers 
__________________ |
|
|
