| Thread Tools |
22nd December 2009, 16:49 | #31 | ||
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| Quote:
Quote:
And yes - I have used newer bios versions. | ||
22nd December 2009, 16:51 | #32 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,023
| so GFX test PCMark05 is failing can you do another test with another HDD bench with/without turbo? http://www.alex-is.de/PHP/fusion/dow...&download_id=9
__________________ |
22nd December 2009, 16:51 | #33 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| FYI - the 'without turbo' is the average of all boards without turbo enabled |
22nd December 2009, 16:52 | #34 | |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| Quote:
| |
22nd December 2009, 16:57 | #35 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,023
| much less pronounced in 3Dmark Vantage, could be a timing issue related to Futuremark benches need to verify with another 3D benchie, Crysis or so
__________________ |
22nd December 2009, 16:59 | #36 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| It's significant that ALL mainboards perform lower when turbo is enabled. |
22nd December 2009, 17:00 | #37 | ||
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,023
| yes. I agree! Quote:
Quote:
__________________ | ||
22nd December 2009, 17:05 | #38 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| Running HDD as we speak - I'll try to install RE5 to verify |
22nd December 2009, 19:06 | #39 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| Last edited by Massman : 22nd December 2009 at 19:38. |
22nd December 2009, 20:03 | #40 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,023
| very interesting! thanks for running those tests. what are you using for storage? SSDs in RAID or the ACARD? either way, I think this needs to be brought to attention of Intel and motherboard manufacturers;
__________________ |
Thread Tools | |
| |