New 20" iMac Screens Show 98% Fewer Colors

jmke · 3rd April 2008, 18:44

Trintech writes points us to an AppleInsider article about another class-action lawsuit directed against Apple Inc. This one claims that the displays on new 20" iMacs are only capable of 6-bit-per-pixel color, 98% fewer colors than Apple advertises. Rather than the 8-bit, in-plane switching (IPS) screens used in 24" iMacs and earlier 20" models, "[t]he new 20-inch iMac features a 6-bit twisted nematic film (TN) LCD screen," according to the article, "which the [law] firm claims is the 'least expensive of its type,' sporting a narrower viewing angle than the display of the 24-inch model, less color depth, less color accuracy, and greater susceptibility to washout." Apple recently settled a very similar class-action suit about the displays on MacBook and MacBook Pro models.

http://hardware.slashdot.org/article...10221&from=rss

3rd April 2008, 21:58

that is even worse than the Samsung Panel Swap in the 226BW, the sky is falling for Apple fans

jmke · 3rd April 2008, 22:40

a bit more info

Quote:

No, the article just wasn't clear. It actually means 6-bits per color channel per pixel. In other words, 18-bits per pixel instead of full 24-bits per pixel. And the reduction from 2^24 to 2^18 does indeed reduce the number of colors from about 16 million to 262,144 - a reduction of about 98% of the entire color space.

and a whole webpage: http://compreviews.about.com/od/mult...a/LCDColor.htm

3rd April 2008, 18:44	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,022	New 20" iMac Screens Show 98% Fewer Colors Trintech writes points us to an AppleInsider article about another class-action lawsuit directed against Apple Inc. This one claims that the displays on new 20" iMacs are only capable of 6-bit-per-pixel color, 98% fewer colors than Apple advertises. Rather than the 8-bit, in-plane switching (IPS) screens used in 24" iMacs and earlier 20" models, "[t]he new 20-inch iMac features a 6-bit twisted nematic film (TN) LCD screen," according to the article, "which the [law] firm claims is the 'least expensive of its type,' sporting a narrower viewing angle than the display of the 24-inch model, less color depth, less color accuracy, and greater susceptibility to washout." Apple recently settled a very similar class-action suit about the displays on MacBook and MacBook Pro models. http://hardware.slashdot.org/article...10221&from=rss __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Fewer companies to show up at CeBIT	jmke	WebNews	1	24th February 2010 19:09
Dinosaur Sightings: Windows splash screens from 1.01 to Vista	jmke	WebNews	0	15th April 2007 21:27
2K’s BioShock Sweeps E3 Best of Show Awards	TheTarget	WebNews	2	1st June 2006 13:47
Apple Makes the Switch: iMac G5 vs. iMac Core Duo	jmke	WebNews	0	2nd February 2006 11:48
Apple Makes the Switch: iMac G5 vs. iMac Core Duo	Sidney	WebNews	1	31st January 2006 05:54
World of Warcraft Machinima Movies, Silent Hunter III: SeaWolves First Screens	jmke	WebNews	0	25th July 2005 20:49
Commandos Strike Force Movie, DOOM 3: Resurrection of Evil New Screens and more	Sidney	WebNews	0	1st March 2005 02:01
Clensing the Apple: iMac Conversion	jmke	WebNews	0	10th January 2005 10:43
2004 SEMA Show Coverage	jmke	WebNews	0	8th November 2004 14:22
Tribes Vengeance Multiplayer Demo, Tony Hawk's Underground 2 Screens	jmke	WebNews	0	30th September 2004 00:18

3rd April 2008, 21:58	#2
Rutar Posts: n/a	that is even worse than the Samsung Panel Swap in the 226BW, the sky is falling for Apple fans