5400rpm disks for storage?

RichBa5tard · 12th January 2004, 00:05

Is there a good reason *not* to buy 5400rpm disks if they were only ment for storage? It would hold music, movies and pictures.

I've got 2 fast (but small) sata disks for both my workstations, on which I only install local apps and perhaps a few games.

All other data is kept on my tiny server: a via epia with 2 ata133 connectors and 10/100mbps lan.

The via epia is supposed to be silent and low in power consumption. Is there a good reason to buy 160GB maxtor 7200rpm 8mb cache (115 euro) instead of 160GB Samsung 5400rpm 2mb (95 euro) drives? The latter produce a little less vibration, less heat and less noise.

If all the data is transferred through a 100mbps switch, i asume i have no benefit of using fast 7200rpm drives above slow 5400rpms?

jmke · 12th January 2004, 00:51

the extra €20 is worth the increase in speed, higher rpm also translates in lower access times, which make the hard drive more reponsive during usage.

BlackRabbit · 12th January 2004, 10:22

If you are the only person accessing the drives, and the data has to go through a 100Mb switch, there'll be no difference if you are reading big, unfragmented, files.
If you read small files that are spread over the medium (or fragmented files) 7200 will be noticable faster, but again, the 100Mb bottleneck might decrease that difference to the minimum.

Pro 5400 argument: get less hot, are much quieter and, I think/suppose, they last longer (pretty important fot data-storage).

jmke · 12th January 2004, 10:30

Contra 5400 argument: will drop faster in re-sale price, meaning you will get a lot less for a 2nd hand 5400rpm drive, then for a 2nd hand 7200rpm drive!

12th January 2004, 20:59

buy seagate 7200RPM drives, silent & fast. They get pretty hot underneath that seashield, but the 7200.x version doesn't have this.

12th January 2004, 00:05	#1
RichBa5tard [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 3,344	5400rpm disks for storage? Is there a good reason not to buy 5400rpm disks if they were only ment for storage? It would hold music, movies and pictures. I've got 2 fast (but small) sata disks for both my workstations, on which I only install local apps and perhaps a few games. All other data is kept on my tiny server: a via epia with 2 ata133 connectors and 10/100mbps lan. The via epia is supposed to be silent and low in power consumption. Is there a good reason to buy 160GB maxtor 7200rpm 8mb cache (115 euro) instead of 160GB Samsung 5400rpm 2mb (95 euro) drives? The latter produce a little less vibration, less heat and less noise. If all the data is transferred through a 100mbps switch, i asume i have no benefit of using fast 7200rpm drives above slow 5400rpms? __________________ HTPC (mac osx): Mac Mini \| Core Duo 1.6Ghz \| 2GB DDR2 \| 26\" TFT Development (mac osx): Macbook \| Core 2 2.0Ghz \| 4GB DDR2 \| 250GB HD Games (win xp): E2160 @ 2.4Ghz \| HD3850 OC \| Asrock 4coredual-vsta \| 2GB DDR2

12th January 2004, 00:51	#2
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,022	the extra €20 is worth the increase in speed, higher rpm also translates in lower access times, which make the hard drive more reponsive during usage. __________________

12th January 2004, 10:22	#3
BlackRabbit Member Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 1,202	If you are the only person accessing the drives, and the data has to go through a 100Mb switch, there'll be no difference if you are reading big, unfragmented, files. If you read small files that are spread over the medium (or fragmented files) 7200 will be noticable faster, but again, the 100Mb bottleneck might decrease that difference to the minimum. Pro 5400 argument: get less hot, are much quieter and, I think/suppose, they last longer (pretty important fot data-storage). __________________ >> imagehosting.jumbee.net -> Free Image Hosting >> favorites.jumbee.net -> Bookmark Manager >> www.datanuke.be -> Lanparty Network Rental, community & reviews

12th January 2004, 10:30	#4
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,022	Contra 5400 argument: will drop faster in re-sale price, meaning you will get a lot less for a 2nd hand 5400rpm drive, then for a 2nd hand 7200rpm drive! __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
SSD versus Enterprise SAS and SATA disks	jmke	WebNews	0	20th March 2009 09:38
Hard disks now encrypt themselves	jmke	WebNews	0	31st October 2006 08:36
Power Usage of Flash vs Hard Disks	jmke	WebNews	0	2nd May 2006 16:44
Hybrid Hard Disks and Beyond	jmke	WebNews	0	15th December 2005 20:27
125GB platters appear in hard disks	jmke	WebNews	0	20th November 2005 23:14
Toshiba announces 30GB dual layer HD disks	Sidney	WebNews	1	21st September 2005 15:28
Pioneer ultraviolet laser promises 500GB disks	jmke	WebNews	0	8th November 2004 10:54
Blu-Ray optical disks to be made from corn	jmke	WebNews	0	3rd November 2004 13:26
Hitachi Makes Hard Disks Sturdier - HGST Boosts Reliability of HDDs	jmke	WebNews	0	31st March 2004 10:18

12th January 2004, 20:59	#5
FreeStyler Posts: n/a	buy seagate 7200RPM drives, silent & fast. They get pretty hot underneath that seashield, but the 7200.x version doesn't have this.