First test is to run these HyperX Predator at their Xtreme Memory Profile (XMP) of 3000C15-16-16-39 with a Command Rate of 2T. To provide some other data we also included the following speeds in the charts:
- 2133C15-15-15-35 2T Command Rate
- 2400C15-15-15-35 2T Command Rate
- 2666C15-15-15-35 2T Command Rate
- 2800C16-18-18-35 2T Command Rate (Corsair Vengeance LPX)
- 3000C15-16-16-39 2T Commmand Rate ( HyperX Predator 3000C15)
- 3000C15-15-15-35 2T Command Rate (G.Skill Ripjaws 4 3000C15)
It will be interesting to see how the HyperX kit will perform versus the slower and looser timed Vengeance LPX 2800C16 kit from Corsair and the G.Skill 3000C15Q GRR kit. As mentioned in the Ripjaws 4 article the results differ slightly from those of the Corsair Vengeance LPX article, this because the CPU clock speed is now set at stock and the uncore raised from 3000 to 3500MHz.
First up SuperPI 32M, a single threaded benchmark that loves raw bandwidth: over 8 seconds are gained from the stock Intel rated 2133 frequency versus the XMP settings of the HyperX Predator 3000C15 kit. The Corsair kit seems to be in for another as whooping, logic as it features 200Mhz less in memory speed and has looser overall timings, Plus price wise the Vengeance kit still retails in between the G.Skill 3000C15 and the today's reviewed HyperX Predator 3000C15 quad channel kit.
As you mighty expect the HyperX kit performs perfectly according the clocks and XMP timings. No surprise it can't match the tighter timing set of the G.Skill kit. But keep in mind some tweaking could unleash a lot more power....
The performance difference between the two 3000MHz kits ain't that big, but looking at the retail street prices the G.Skill kit outedges the HyperX kit anyday...